Overall Power Factor of three motors for transformer voltage drop calculation

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the overall power factor at the transformer secondary for three motors connected to a single busbar, one cannot simply average the individual power factors. Instead, the current for each motor should be converted into rectangular form, combining real and reactive components before summing them. The total current is then calculated, and the overall power factor is derived from the resulting angle. The calculations provided show a close agreement between the total current derived from both the rectangular method and simple addition, highlighting the importance of considering phase differences. This method effectively demonstrates the relationship between individual motor loads and the overall system performance.
Physicist3
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi

Suppose I have three motors connected to a single busbar which is fed by a single transformer and suppose that the current into the busbar (i.e. the total current of the transformer secondary) is known. If I wish to calculate the transformer voltage drop the I will obviously need the load power factor. If the power factors of each of the motors is known, can the powerfactor at the transformer secondary (i.e. the overall load powerfactor) be obtained by taking the average of the three motors.

E.g. if Motor A is assumed to have PF of 0.88, Motor B PF = 0.86 & Motor C PF = 0.84, is PF at busbar 0.86?

Many Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No.
The whole is equal to the sum of its parts not the average of its parts.

Make each motor current into rectangular form, real amps +jreactive amps ,

and add 'em up.

If this is a homework problem,
teacher probably wants you to solve some simultaneous equations to arrive at the answer.
Use phasors to make it a geometry problem that you can visualize

given only total current and power factor
you can draw a right triangle whose hypotenuse is total current and other two sides are real and imaginary amps.
what three smaller right triangles will add to give that one?

I think that'll work though haven't tried it myself.
Keep us posted?

old jim
 
Hi jim, many thanks for the reply and your advice :).

Considering the following theoretical example, and based upon what you have said, does this look about right:

Motor A: Drawing 55A, PF = 0.88
Motor B: Drawing 62A, PF = 0.79
Motor C: Drawing 87A, PF = 0.82

Motor A:

Φ = cos-1(0.88) = 28.36°

Real current component = I * PF = 55*0.88 = 48.4A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 55*Sin(28.36) = 26.13A

Motor A Current is therefore 48.40 + j26.13A

Motor B:

Φ = cos-1(0.79) = 37.81°

Real current component = I * PF = 62*0.79 = 48.98A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 62*Sin(37.81) = 38.01A

Motor B Current is therefore 48.98 + j38.01A

Motor C:

Φ = cos-1(0.82) = 34.92°

Real current component = I * PF = 87*0.82 = 71.34A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 87*Sin(34.92) = 49.80A

Motor C Current is therefore 71.34 + j49.80A

Total Current

Total current = A+B+C = 48.40+j26.13 + 48.98+j38.01 + 71.34+j49.80 = 168.72+j113.94

Total Current = √(168.722+113.942) = 203.59A

Φ = tan-1(113.94/168.72) = 34.03°

Overall PF of three motor loads = cos(34.03) = 0.829

I hop this is correct as when I calculate the total current using KCL (current into busbar = current leaving busbar etc.) I get the following;

I = 55+62+87 = 204A

which is very close to the total value obtained using real and reactive component method for each motor?

Many Thanks in advance
 
Your method looks perfect
and your orderly presentation is a delight to see.
Please excuse me for not checking the arithmetic in your polar to rectangular conversions , i know you are plenty capable
and i can hardly see the numbers on my slide rule anymore...

That your total current comes out 203.59
versus 204 from just adding them without adjusting for their slightly different phase
is such a small difference that it comes as a bit of a surprise . It would be hard to discern that little bit of difference on my 6" slide rule.

still, that they differ makes the point.
I guess this wasn't homework - surely a textbook author would have chosen currents that made the point more emphatically ?
If you are curious make one motor have a leading PF (synchronous motor can do that)
and see what it does to result

Basic rule of thumb : Add in rectangular co-ordinates, multiply in polar.

Congratulations ! You done good ! I have vicariously enjoyed your success.
and it is really heartwarming to see such orderly work.
Nice job. I bet it felt good.old jim
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top