Overweight Truck Crossing a Bridge

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge Truck
AI Thread Summary
A truck carrying chickens exceeds the weight limit for a bridge, while the empty truck is compliant. The discussion revolves around the idea that if the chickens could be made to fly inside the truck, their weight would not impact the truck's load on the bridge. However, it's clarified that the suggestion involves banging on the truck to make the chickens fly, not the chickens banging on the truck. The concept raises questions about the physics of weight distribution and air support. Ultimately, the feasibility of this solution is debated, highlighting the complexities of the scenario.
physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
A truck carrying chickens is too heavy for a bridge that it needs to cross. The empty truck is within the weight limits; with the chickens it is overweight. It is suggested that if one could get the chickens to fly around in the truck by banging on the truck side, it would be safe to cross the bridge. Do you agree? Explain.

I'd agree if you could get the chickens banging on the sides of the truck so that the force they exert on the truck is sideways and not downward as it would be if they are stationary. Any suggestions or insights that I'm missing to solve this problem?

Thanks in adv.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Funny!
My humble opinion is that if the chickens only exert on the truck a sideway force, they will fall since there is no force counteracting the weight.
 
physicsss said:
A truck carrying chickens is too heavy for a bridge that it needs to cross. The empty truck is within the weight limits; with the chickens it is overweight. It is suggested that if one could get the chickens to fly around in the truck by banging on the truck side, it would be safe to cross the bridge. Do you agree? Explain.

I'd agree if you could get the chickens banging on the sides of the truck so that the force they exert on the truck is sideways and not downward as it would be if they are stationary. Any suggestions or insights that I'm missing to solve this problem?

Thanks in adv.

Yes, I suggest that you read the problem more closely. Nothing is said about chickens banging on the sides of the truck, it is about you banging on the sides of the truck in order to make the chickens fly!
The "idea" would be that, in flight, the chickens weight would not affect the truck. Of course, one would have to consider that the air that is supporting the chickens is supported by the truck.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top