Oxidation states of manganese and pH

AI Thread Summary
The stability of manganese oxidation states varies with pH, showing that Mn acts as a stronger oxidizing agent in acidic conditions. This raises questions about the stability of higher oxidation states of manganese in alkaline environments. A brown precipitate forms in permanganate solutions, indicating potential decomposition reactions. Participants are encouraged to explore the reaction equations for this decomposition and identify the products. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for applications in chemistry and environmental science.
Moogie
Messages
167
Reaction score
1
Hi

I am interested in the change in the stability of the oxidation states of manganese with pH

Mn is a stronger oxidising agent in acid than in base which would lead you to believe that the higher oxidation states of Mn are more stable in alkaline conditions.

Does anyone have a reason why? I couldn't find one

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a brown precipitate forming in solutions of permanganate. Have you tried to write reaction equation for the decomposition reaction? What are products of the decomposition?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top