- #1
BSMSMSTMSPHD
- 131
- 0
I'm working on the proof of the following statement: Prove that any finite group G of even order contains an element of order 2.
What frustrates me about this is that I know from a previous class that this statement immediately follows from Cauchy's Theorem. So, in a way, I don't want to prove it using group axioms.
But I hafta, so whining aside, I will carry on. But I seem to be stuck.
So far, I am looking at the subset of G that contains elements that are not of order 2. That is:
[tex] H = \{ g \in G \ | \ g \neq g^{-1} \} [/tex]
I think that this set must have an even number of elements since for each h in H, the inverse of h must also be in H, and, they can't be the same.
Does this make sense?
Then, H complement must include at least the identity of G. So, since G is the union of H and H complement, it seems that there must be at least one more element, a, in H complement, so that the total number of elements in G is indeed even.
Thus, a fulfills the role of the element of order 2.
Mathematical casualness aside, does this sound good? Thanks...
EDIT: Ok, maybe "painstaking" was a bit overdramatic...
What frustrates me about this is that I know from a previous class that this statement immediately follows from Cauchy's Theorem. So, in a way, I don't want to prove it using group axioms.
But I hafta, so whining aside, I will carry on. But I seem to be stuck.
So far, I am looking at the subset of G that contains elements that are not of order 2. That is:
[tex] H = \{ g \in G \ | \ g \neq g^{-1} \} [/tex]
I think that this set must have an even number of elements since for each h in H, the inverse of h must also be in H, and, they can't be the same.
Does this make sense?
Then, H complement must include at least the identity of G. So, since G is the union of H and H complement, it seems that there must be at least one more element, a, in H complement, so that the total number of elements in G is indeed even.
Thus, a fulfills the role of the element of order 2.
Mathematical casualness aside, does this sound good? Thanks...
EDIT: Ok, maybe "painstaking" was a bit overdramatic...
Last edited: