Paint thinner, oil, and water in a jar

  • Thread starter Thread starter BH20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oil Paint Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of stirring different liquids—paint thinner, oil, and water—on the depth of the resulting vortex. Key points include that the size of the vortex is influenced by the viscosity of the liquids; lower viscosity allows for a deeper and longer-lasting vortex due to reduced friction between liquid layers. Participants note that the thinner the liquid, the more easily it can be stirred, leading to a more pronounced vortex. The conversation also touches on the role of intermolecular bonding, with a consensus that viscosity is more relevant to the physical properties of the liquids rather than their molecular structure. Additionally, it is emphasized that stirring speed must be consistent for accurate comparisons. Overall, water is identified as the easiest to stir, but the relative performance of oil and paint thinner remains uncertain without empirical testing.
BH20
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
If I was to put paint thinner, oil, and water in a jar (individually..not together)...and then stirred, which one would have the biggest vortex (depth)? I know I can do it, and I will for the other two, but don't have paint thinner.

and what type of intermolecular bonding is present in each of the liquids used in the experiment?

Thanks
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I don't know about any bonding or anything, but the size of the vortex would depend of how long and how hard/fast you stir it, and the liquid you are stirring.

the liquid will have inertia and will want to keep on going around and around in circles, but the thicker the liquid and the less viscus, the faster it will slow down and stop itself. so, i would have to say that the thinest of the liquids will have the vortex of the greatest depth because you will be able to get the liquid going and keep it going faster around in a circle in the bottle for longer, so the vortex will remain deaper and longer, then it would if you were to stir something thick, like caremel or something like that.

that is just my way of thinking of it, maybe there is some chemical property that applies, I don't know, but this explanation seems to make sense to me.
 
As mrjeffy321 explained it too, I think it has something to do with viscosity. The less the viscosity of the liquid, the faster the whirlpool (vortex) will be. This is my reasoning, and it may be useful if you look for viscosity comparisons of these three liquids.

Viscosity is briefly the friction of liquid layers, and if it is higher, the liquid is said to be more viscous. So I don't think that it involves much of molecular-level bonding, but somewhat physical attributes like friction is more likely to be the reason for it.
 
Density would be determinant too, don´t forget that hidrostatic pressure=density*g*h

chem_tr said:
Viscosity is briefly the friction of liquid layers, and if it is higher, the liquid is said to be more viscous. So I don't think that it involves much of molecular-level bonding, but somewhat physical attributes like friction is more likely to be the reason for it.

Viscosity is a direct macroscopic consequence of intermolecular interactions. Remember for example that viscosymetric measures are used in polymers to experimentally obtain molecular mass averages.
 
Yes. I understand all of that.

Of course we have to stir it at the same speed or else the results will not be very accurate.

Obviously water would be the easiest to stir, but then I don't know if it be oil or paint thinner, since I don't have paint thinner. So, that was my question.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top