Pair instability supernova pressure and temperature question

heartofcourage
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I read a scientific journal article that discusses pair instability supernova - I am puzzled about something discussed in the article. If the collision of atomic nuclei and energetic gamma rays produces electron and positron pairs which reduces the pressure inside a supermassive star's core - why is this so? I don't understand this because of the ideas of conservation of mass and energy. Although electrons and positrons are much smaller than protons or neutrons the mass is conserved isn't it - even after conversion from the former to the latter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pair production involves gamma rays converted to electron-positron pairs. The atomic nuclei enter only to keep momentum balanced. They are otherwise unaffected.
 
The total energy density does not change, but the pressure gets reduced as massive particles lead to a lower pressure per energy compared to photons.

For a gas, pV=NkT, where kT is a typical energy of the particles excluding the rest mass, multiplied with the number of particles we get the total kinetic energy (neglecting the potential energy). A rest mass contributes to energy density, but not to pressure.
 
The way that I understand it is that either electron degeneracy pressure or radiative pressure prevent stars' cores collapsing from the gravity of their mass. If you create more particles pairs that have momentum as well striking atomic nuclei to give them some momentum then shouldn't this create enough energy to cause pressure to resist the force of gravity (which would increase with the additional mass from the particle pairs created)?
 
There is still pressure, but it is lower than pure radiation pressure at the same energy density would be.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top