Pair Production: Creating Matter from Light

LiteHacker
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Pair production interests me - create matter from electromagnetic waves.

So far I have read that a Positron-Electron pair can be created by photons having energy exceeding twice the rest energy (m * c ^ 2) of an electron (1.022 MeV).

So, if you have photons exceeding the energy of an up and down quark, (Max 6.8 MeV), you would be creating up and down quarks in addition to electrons and positrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, except for two things. First, you can only create particles and antiparticles in pairs. And a down quark is not the antiparticle of an up quark. Each "flavor" of quark has its own antiparticle. Second, you need to create particles that can exist on their own, and a quark cannot. For example you could create a π+ π- pair, 140 Mev for each pion.
 
Since neutrinos have a near zero mass, would there be many of them created then before getting anywhere near the electron-positron pair?
 
Pair-production is an electromagnetic interaction - and neutrinos don't experience that one.
Prev discussion.

[edit]
Appears you can get photo-production of neutrinos in theory, but that needs a strong magnetic field so you would not expect a flurry of neutrinos showing up ahead of the usual pair-production.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top