Parabolic Motion: Convert to Equation & Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter tarkimos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
tarkimos
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if it is possible to convert a projectile motion(velocity, direction, etc) into a (parabolic) equation.
I am programming a motion planner to use in a simple 'game' that I am making.
A formula would be appreciated.
I was thinking something like http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/187/eq220d30dcno9.png
To get the x value I am using the range formula
attachment.php?attachmentid=11352&stc=1&d=1193446035.png

I am then using a similar formula to calculate the total time of flight.
Then I am dividing the range by the total time of flight.
 

Attachments

  • formula1xw6.png
    formula1xw6.png
    209 bytes · Views: 486
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hello?
 
If the acceleration is constant,
y(t) = \frac12 a t^2 + v(0) t + x(0),
otherwise you should take something like
y(t) = \int v(t) dt = \iint a(t) dt dt
and do a numerical integration.
 
Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top