Parallel line currents & Lorentz transformation

AI Thread Summary
Two parallel infinite line currents of equal magnitude attract each other in one reference frame but seem to repel in another due to the effects of Lorentz transformation. In the frame K', where the current is zero, the linear densities of positive and negative charges change, leading to a non-zero total density. This transformation respects the symmetry between the two lines, suggesting that like charges should repel each other in K'. The discussion highlights the complexities of analyzing forces in different reference frames, particularly with respect to electromagnetic interactions. The conclusion drawn is that the apparent attraction in one frame may become repulsion in another due to these transformations.
Preno
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Okay, I'm sure I must have overlooked something very trivial, so please help me with this:

Two parallel infinite line currents of equal magnitude attract each other. The current can be thought of as consisting of positive and negative particles with equal linear densities, but each moving with a different velocity (wlog let's assume the positive ones are static in some frame of reference K). Let us now move to the frame of reference K' which moves with the current so that the current in K' is zero. The force which was purely magnetic in K is now replaced with a purely electrical one - the linear densities of the positive and negative particles undergo Lorentz transformation, so that the total density in K' is non-zero.

Here's my problem: if linear densities and the velocities of particles (and hence the currents) have the same magnitude in K, then they must also have the same magnitude in K' (the transformation respects the symmetry between the two lines). But like charges repel each other. So it would seem that in K' (hence also in K), the currents actually repel each other.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Preno! :smile:
Preno said:
The current can be thought of as consisting of positive and negative particles with equal linear densities, but each moving with a different velocity …
Let us now move to the frame of reference K' which moves with the current so that the current in K' is zero. …

Sorry, I'm not following what K' is …

as you say, there are two lots of charge, moving with a different velocity. :confused:

(and don't forget the Lorentz-Fitzgerald length-contraction)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Preno! :smile:


Sorry, I'm not following what K' is …
K' is the frame in which the current vanishes.
as you say, there are two lots of charge, moving with a different velocity. :confused:
Well, the line is electrically neutral, so there need to be both positive and negative charges.
(and don't forget the Lorentz-Fitzgerald length-contraction)
No, I'm not forgetting it. That's the whole point. The linear density of those charges changes when transforming to K' but it remains the same on both lines. Hence they should repel each other.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top