Parallel Plate Capacitor Diameter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the diameter of disks in a parallel-plate capacitor, given the electric field strength and the number of electrons transferred. The user initially calculates the radius as 0.5 mm but finds the diameter incorrect upon doubling. A suggestion is made to use formulas specifically for parallel-plate capacitors instead of those for charged circular disks. Additionally, converting the charge from electrons to coulombs is recommended to find the area using Gauss's law. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying the correct equations for accurate results.
tomizzo
Messages
113
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Two circular disks spaced 0.50 mm apart form a parallel-plate capacitor. Transferring 1.70 ×109 electrons from one disk to the other causes the electric field strength to be 3.50 ×105N/C.

What are the diameters of the disks?

Homework Equations



Refer to attachment

The Attempt at a Solution



So I substitute everything into the formula and end up getting R = .5 mm. I then double this to find the diameter and still get the wrong answer. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    1.9 KB · Views: 727
Physics news on Phys.org
tomizzo said:

Homework Statement



Two circular disks spaced 0.50 mm apart form a parallel-plate capacitor. Transferring 1.70 ×109 electrons from one disk to the other causes the electric field strength to be 3.50 ×105N/C.

What are the diameters of the disks?

Homework Equations



Refer to attachment

The Attempt at a Solution



So I substitute everything into the formula and end up getting R = .5 mm. I then double this to find the diameter and still get the wrong answer. Any ideas?

Not sure what you're intending to do with that equation you attached. It looks like the on-axis field for a charged circular disk at some distance z from the disk along the axis. But here you have a parallel plate capacitor and the field will be (essentially) uniform between the parallel plates.

Look instead to formulas related to parallel plate capacitors.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
convert Q to Coulombs, then use Gauss to obtain Area.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top