Parallel plate capacitor with dielectric in a gravitational field.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a homework problem involving a square parallel plate capacitor filled with a dielectric material in a gravitational field. Participants explore the equilibrium condition for the dielectric, which experiences both gravitational and electrostatic forces, despite having no overall charge. The electrostatic attraction arises from the movement of electrons within the dielectric towards the positive plate, creating a force that influences its position. The capacitance is calculated for both the dielectric-filled and air-filled sections, leading to a formula for the force acting on the dielectric. The conversation concludes with insights on analyzing small oscillations around the equilibrium point, emphasizing the importance of understanding the forces at play.
adwodon
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A square parallel plate capacitor with vertical plates of area A
and distance d, charged with a constant charge Q and is completely
filled with a dielectric material the same dimension as the gap between
the plates, with dielectric constant k and mass m. Assuming
the dielectric is a solid block of material that can move inside the
capacitor with no friction, what would be the equilibrium condition
in the presence of gravitational field? What would be the period of
small oscillations around this equilibrium point?

Homework Equations



C=(k\epsilon0A)/d

The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly I don't know where to begin with this question. Is it suggesting that the dielectric would oscillate from side to side between the plates? How? I am assuming I've just stared at the problem too long and I am missing something obvious, so if someone could just nudge me in the right direction by pointing out what this question is asking it would help a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vertical plates! There will be two forces in balance, one the weight of the dialectric, the other an electrostatic attraction between plates and the dialectric.
 
Why is there electrostatic attraction toward the dielectric, it has no charge! Adwodon I am pretty sure youre on my course btw. UCL?
 
Hey
Sorry Chi Meson I forgot to thank you it was a case of me staring at it so long I completely ignored the vertical part, it took a while but I figured it out before our original due date (tuesday), we got an extension though as barely anyone could do all 3 questions (this being the first and easiest).

Connor yes I am at UCL.

The dielectric has no overall charge, but the electrons will move towards the positive plate of the capacitor so you get something like this:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...x-Capacitor_schematic_with_dielectric.svg.png

So the attraction is only between the edge of the dielectric.
When a dielectric is fully inserted this force will cancel itself out, but if there is a gap it will pull it in (ie if the dielectric starts to fall out it will be pulled back in)

If you want some help imagine the dielectric is horizontal for now, push it into the dielectric by a distance x

Capacitance of the part filled with dielectric will be:

C1=(e0KLx)/d

Part filled with air:

C2=(e0L(L-x))/d

as the volage across the two parts is the same
C=C1+C2

As charge is constant:

U= (-Q^2)/2C

F= -dU/dx

Thats how you figure out the force the plates put on the dielectric, then just imagine the plates were vertical. As for the small oscillations, just see what happens when the dielectric is pushed a small distance past equilibrium (y, where y<<x).

If you're still having trouble I am easy to spot, I am the guy with the arm covered in tattoos. Although I am pretty sure I've nailed this one I haven't touched the rest of this problem sheet though. Too busy with other work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top