Parallel resistance and heat problem

AI Thread Summary
Replacing a 60W bulb with a 100W bulb in parallel with a heater does not change the rate of heat produced by the heater. The voltage across both components remains constant at 220V, meaning the heater's resistance and power output stay the same regardless of the bulb's wattage. The calculations show that the current drawn by the circuit increases with the higher wattage bulb, but this does not affect the heater's heat output. The key point is that the heat generated by the heater remains unchanged in this parallel configuration. Thus, the overall heat production from the heater remains constant.
KauGan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A heater joined in parallel with a 60W bulb is connected to the mains. If 60W bulb is replaced by a 100W bulb, will the rate of heat produced be more/less/remain the same ?


Potential Difference = 220V

Homework Equations


H= VIt = I^2Rt = V^2*t/R
P= VI

The Attempt at a Solution


R= (V^2/P)
= 48400/60
=806.6 ohms

R = V^2/P
= 48400/100
= 484 ohms

I=V/R
= 220/806.6
= 0.27 A
I = V/R
= 220/484
= 0.45 A

I am stuck here. I noticed that it is given 'rate of heat' which is rate of energy which is again nothing but power.
I don't know what I'm finding in the problem.:confused:
How do I calculate the rate of heat of the heater in parallel with the bulb ?
Has parallel connection of the bulb and heater anything to do with the problem, or is it just to confuse us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must first decide if the question is asking about the heat generated by the heater or by the total system (heater plus bulb).
 
H = v^2*t/R.

In parallel combination, V is the same for all components. So by connecting 60 W bulb or 100W bulb will not change the resistance of the heater or the voltage across. So H remains the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top