Parallel resistanee is reciprocal of the sum?

AI Thread Summary
Parallel resistance is calculated as the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals of individual resistances due to the nature of current flow in parallel circuits. When voltage is constant, the total current is the sum of the currents through each resistor, leading to the equation I = V/R. This results in the relationship 1/R_eq = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + ..., where R_eq is the equivalent resistance. The reciprocal sum reflects how resistors share the total current, making the overall resistance lower than any individual resistance. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing parallel circuits effectively.
Lokhtar
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is parallel resistance the reciprocal of all individual resistances?

Homework Equations



V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, since V is constant and I is different, you can write it as I=V/R, and since V won't change, you can make it I=V*(1/R1+1/R2),etc. So I get that, but why do you then have to take the reciprocal of all the resistances to get the total resistance? Wouldn't it just be the direct sum of the individual 1/Rs??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lokhtar said:

Homework Statement



Why is parallel resistance the reciprocal of all individual resistances?

Homework Equations



V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, since V is constant and I is different, you can write it as I=V/R, and since V won't change, you can make it I=V*(1/R1+1/R2),etc. So I get that, but why do you then have to take the reciprocal of all the resistances to get the total resistance? Wouldn't it just be the direct sum of the individual 1/Rs??

Because, by definition, I = V/R_{eq}. So setting this equal to your expression, we get

\frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1 + R_2 + \ldots}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top