Parallel resistors and ammeter problem

AI Thread Summary
A student connected an ammeter in parallel with one of two identical resistors, resulting in a reading of 0.40 A. If the ammeter had been correctly connected in series with both resistors, the reading would have been 0.20 A due to the division of current between the resistors. Kirchhoff's first law indicates that the total current entering a junction equals the total current leaving it, which helps explain the current distribution. Ohm's Law is also relevant, showing that current is inversely proportional to resistance. The correct understanding of these concepts leads to the conclusion that the series connection yields a lower current reading.
Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A student mistakenly connects a perfect ammeter (i.e one of negligible resistance), in parellel with one of the two of the two identical resistors. The ammeter reads of 0.40 A.
What would the reading have been if he had correctly connected the ammeter in series with two resistors? The cell also has negligible resistance.

http://upload.lhurgoyf.net/gal/Other/physics0908.JPG

Homework Equations



\Delta Q = I\Delta T
Kirchhoff's first law

The Attempt at a Solution



At this stage in the book, only the two relevant equations/law have been discussed. The answer is 0.20A but I'm not exactly sure why and how I would get this answer. It seems that it can only possibly be relevant to Kirchhoff's, the sum of the currents entering a junction must equal the sum leaving the junction.

The current in between the two resistors (before the junction) must be 0.40A then, so it seems that the reading on the ammeter should be 0.40A. I don't think I understand the concept properly, a clue would be good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered the current in the first resistor as shown in the diagram?
 
You're making this too complicated; as you suspected, you're not seeing the concept. You need only Ohm's Law at this point.
 
I=\frac{V}{R}

\therefore I \propto \frac{1}{R}

I_1 = \frac{V}{R} = 0.40

I_2 = \frac{V}{2R} = \frac{I_1}{2} = 0.20
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
669
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top