B Parallel Spacetimes: Matter & Antimatter Separated?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical possibility of parallel spacetimes for matter and antimatter separated by a void. Mainstream scientific theories reject this idea, asserting that spacetime is a four-dimensional manifold that cannot exist in parallel or within a void. Additionally, spacetime is inherently curved, not flat, and does not consist of matter or antimatter, which exist within spacetime. Some participants suggest alternative analogies, like two-ply toilet paper, to illustrate their thoughts on the relationship between these concepts. Ultimately, the thread was closed for moderation, with a suggestion to reference mainstream sources for further discussion.
Chris W Kullander
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it possible for two plains of parallel spacetime to exist separated by some sort of void? One being antimatter and one being matter with the void bringing neutral territory. Like a piece of paper between two big magnets.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, not in any mainstream theories that are used by professional scientists. Spacetime is a 4-dimensional manifold that doesn't exist inside of anything else, so it can't be parallel to anything (nor is it inside a 'void'). Not only that, but spacetime is not flat, it is curved, so I don't think it could be parallel anyways. It's also not made up of matter or antimatter. Both of these exist 'on top of' or 'inside' of spacetime. I put them in quotes because neither word really describes the situation accurately, but it's the best I could come up with.
 
Drakkith said:
No, not in any mainstream theories that are used by professional scientists. Spacetime is a 4-dimensional manifold that doesn't exist inside of anything else, so it can't be parallel to anything (nor is it inside a 'void'). Not only that, but spacetime is not flat, it is curved, so I don't think it could be parallel anyways. It's also not made up of matter or antimatter. Both of these exist 'on top of' or 'inside' of spacetime. I put them in quotes because neither word really describes the situation accurately, but it's the best I could come up with.
what if it wasn't in the void but around it. Like two ply toilet paper ( sorry for the lame example). It can curve and bend in parallel to the other. Each spacetime would have it's own presumed "antimatter and matter" but really it all falls under one or the other. A perfect opposite to the opposing plain of space. A perfect positive, a perfect neutral, and a perfect negative.
 
Chris W Kullander said:
what if it wasn't in the void but around it. Like two ply toilet paper ( sorry for the lame example). It can curve and bend in parallel to the other. Each spacetime would have it's own presumed "antimatter and matter" but really it all falls under one or the other. A perfect opposite to the opposing plain of space. A perfect positive, a perfect neutral, and a perfect negative.

where are you getting this stuff ? or are you just making it up as you go ?
You seem to be just throwing a bunch of thoughts/ideas together and hoping they make sense

you should know that in the real world ... NOTHING is perfect

just read the post from Drakkith again
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
@Chris W Kullander -- Your thread will remain closed. If you can find links to mainstream websites about related issues and you want to discuss them, please start a new thread with those links and ask specific questions about the information in the links. Thank you.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top