Parallel Transport: Constancy of Magnitudes & Angles Along Geodesic

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
A vector field Y is parallely propagated (with respect to the Levi-Civita connection)
along an affinely parameterized geodesic with tangent vector X in a Riemannian
manifold. Show that the magnitudes of the vectors X, Y and the angle between
them are constant along the geodesic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some questions to get you started.

What is the definition of parallel transport?
What does along the geodesic mean?
How is the angle between two vectors defined?
 
betel said:
Some questions to get you started.

What is the definition of parallel transport?
What does along the geodesic mean?
How is the angle between two vectors defined?

The tensor T is parrallely transported along the curve with tangent X^a if \nabla_X T=0

Along the geodesic means along the affinely parameterised curve of shortest distance (think i may be a bit off here but hopefully you can clear it up!)

On a Riemannian manifold, the angle between two vectors is given by

\theta = \cos^{-1} \left( \frac{ g(X,Y) }{ ( |X||Y| ) } \right) where |X|= \sqrt{ g(X,X)}
 
So what is your problem?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top