Parallel vs Series Circuits: Capacitors & Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter nothilaryy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Series
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the configuration of capacitors in circuits can be confusing, especially when analyzing scenarios without a power source. When two capacitors are connected by two wires, they are in parallel, allowing for transient currents if one is charged and the other is not. Over time, these transient currents will cease, resulting in a combined capacitance equal to the sum of the two capacitors. In circuits without a power source, no significant changes occur, and the focus on total capacitance is unnecessary unless connected to another component. Ultimately, the behavior of the capacitors depends on their initial charge states and the circuit configuration.
nothilaryy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This isn't for anyone specific homework problem, just a general lack of understanding of series and parallel circuits in certain cases. Given most normal circuits with a battery and some varying combination of capacitors and resistors I can tell which branches are in series and parallel and solve quite accurately; however, when you take away the battery and are left with a capacitor charging other capacitors I have no idea whether that would be in series or a parallel. Think just two capacitors connected by two wires. I hope I'm describing this ok, I don't have a picture which would probably help- let me know if you need clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two capacitors connected with TWO wires must be connected in parallel. Interesting things could happen for a very short time if one of them was charged and the other not charged when they are connected. But soon transient currents would cease and you would just have effectively one capacitor with the sum of the two capacitances.

Nothing happens when their are no sources in the circuit.
 
Delphi51 said:
Two capacitors connected with TWO wires must be connected in parallel. Interesting things could happen for a very short time if one of them was charged and the other not charged when they are connected. But soon transient currents would cease and you would just have effectively one capacitor with the sum of the two capacitances.

Nothing happens when their are no sources in the circuit.

The capacitors are in series as well. The same current goes through both.
 
"
Two capacitors connected with TWO wires must be connected in parallel. Interesting things could happen for a very short time if one of them was charged and the other not charged when they are connected. But soon transient currents would cease and you would just have effectively one capacitor with the sum of the two capacitances."​
A situation where one was charged and the other wasn't or they were both charged to different voltages was what I was referring to. Basically I'm trying to see if the charges on all the plates should be equal or the voltages and whether I should find the total capacitance by looking at it in series or parallel.

And now it seems I have two conflicting answers?
 
nothilaryy said:
A situation where one was charged and the other wasn't or they were both charged to different voltages was what I was referring to. Basically I'm trying to see if the charges on all the plates should be equal or the voltages and whether I should find the total capacitance by looking at it in series or parallel.

And now it seems I have two conflicting answers?

I wouldn't worry about the total capacitance of the 2 capacitors unless you hook them up to something else.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why Do Capacitors Behave Differently in Series and Parallel Configurations?
Replies
20
Views
2K
How to determine if electrical components are connected in parallel or in series?
Replies
10
Views
900
Finding parallel or in-series resistors
Replies
3
Views
667
Why Capacitors in Parallels vs. Series: Coaxial Capacitor Case
Replies
2
Views
2K
Electrical Circuits - Parallel vs. Series
Replies
14
Views
1K
What is the voltage across this capacitor, inductor and resistor?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Finding Current in Resistors & Charge of Capacitor
Replies
4
Views
2K
Questions about a capacitor with 4 parallel plates
Replies
14
Views
1K
How Do You Calculate Capacitance in a DC Circuit with a Fully Charged Capacitor?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Series RLC and Parallel RLC circuits
Replies
15
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top