Parameterizing a curve (line integrals)

filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a vector valued function that I need to integrate over a curve C (which I know how to do). I need to create a vector valued function r(t) for any position on the curve C (see the picture). r(t) is a defined area in the XY-plane and I'm pretty sure it needs a piecewise function.


Homework Equations


See picture
http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/4368/graphgr.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


This might work, but I'm afraid of the undefined derivative.

r(t)=
0\leqt<1 9ti+0j
1\leqt<2 9i+3(t-1)j
2\leqt\leq3 (9-9(t-2))i+(3-\sqrt{9(t-2)}j

r'(t)=
0\leqt<1 9i+0j
1\leqt<2 0i+3j
2\leqt\leq3 -9i-3/(2\sqrt{t-2})j



You'll notice that the last part of the r'(t) vector is undefined at t=2. Is this appropriate? How do you do it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait...is this a path independence thing? Can I get rid of the square root curve and use a straight line from (9,3) to (0,0)?
 
As to your parameterizations. You can work all three pieces separately as if they were separate problems so you don't need to make t itself increase through all three parts. And t doesn't have to go from 0 to 1. So think about these parameterizations:

C1 x = t, y = 0, t: 0 --> 9

C2 x = 9, y = t, t: 0 --> 3

On the square root you can think of it as x = y2 and do this:

C1 x = t2, y = t t: 3 --> 0 (note the direction)

As to your second question about independence of path. That isn't a question about the path, it is a question about the vector field. You didn't give us that but you can check it. If the conditions for independence of path hold, you don't have to do any work to solve the line integral. Do you see why?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top