Parametric curve /derivative problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParoxysmX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Parametric
ParoxysmX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the parametric curve given by the equation

x(t) = ti + t^(1/3)j1. Calculate x'(t). Does the vector exist at t=0?

2. Find a new parametrisation of the curve for which the tangent vector is well
defined at all points. What is the value of the vector at the origin?

The Attempt at a Solution



For q.1, is it as simple as finding dx/dt? which would be 1 + \frac{1}{3\sqrt[3]{t^{2}}}?

As for q.2, I'm completely stumped.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it really is as simple as finding dx/dt. No, what you have is NOT dx/dt. x(t) is a vector and dx/dt is a vector: dx/dt= i+ \frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}j.

As for (2), e^s exists for all s so try e^si+ e^{s/3}j.
Do you see why that is also a parameterization for the curve?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it really is as simple as finding dx/dt. No, what you have is NOT dx/dt. x(t) is a vector and dx/dt is a vector: dx/dt= i+ \frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}j.

Ah yes, my mistake. So this should mean that dx/dt does not exist at t=0, since \frac{1}{3}t^{-2/3}j becomes 1/0, giving i + ∞j.

HallsofIvy said:
As for (2), e^s exists for all s so try e^si+ e^{s/3}j.
Do you see why that is also a parameterization for the curve?

Yeah. dx/ds in this case would be defined at s=0, which is what we want. Is this sort of like 'moving' the origin?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top