Parametric curves applications

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Q: A particle is following the path C: f(t)=(2cos(t), 2sin(t), t), t>=0, and flies off on the tangent line at time t=3pi/2. Find the position of the particle at time t=5pi/2.

Solution:
f'(t)=(-2sint,2cost,1)
f'(3pi/2)=(2,0,1)
f(3pi/2)=(0,-2,3pi/2)

Equation of the tangent line:
l(s)=(0,-2,3pi/2) + s(2,0,1)

s=0, (0,-2,3pi/2)
So s=5pi/2 - 3pi/2 = pi gives position at t=5pi/2

l(pi)=(0,-2,3pi/2) + pi (2,0,1)
= (2pi, -2, 5pi/2) [answer]

I don't understand the red part. How come s=pi gives position at t=5pi/2 ? What is the relation between s and t? Are they realted linearly?

It would be nice if someone can explain this part. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
s = t - \frac{3\pi}{2}

It just represents the starting time when the particle leaves the curve.
 
But I don't get WHY...
Why not, say, s = t^2 -3pi/2 or s= t - 2* 3pi/2?
 
It's simple variable substitution. Here's an analogy. Say you have the equation y = m(x - x_0) + y_0. For convenience, I can let s = x - x_0, which means y = ms + y_0. Same thing is happening here.

Though I haven't seen parametric equations written in this form before , I think the equation of the tangent line could have been written (w/o variable substitution) as:

l(t)=(0,-2,3pi/2) + (t-3pi/2)(2,0,1)

letting s = t-3pi/2 results in:

l(s)=(0,-2,3pi/2) + s(2,0,1)

When t = 5pi/2, s = 5pi/2-3pi/2 = pi
 
Last edited:
If it is 3:00 now, how long will be until it is 5:00?

Would you even consider saying s = (5)2 -3 or s= 5 - 2(3)?
 
Why would the position on the tangent line be moved by (2,0,1) per second?[/color]
Say, l(s)=(0,-2,3pi/2) + s(8,0,4), I changed the direction vector, but this would still represent the same line, how can I figure out how s and t are related now?

Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top