Parametrization in R^3: Comparing Tangent Vectors of Different Curves

  • Thread starter Thread starter ayalam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parametrization
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of tangent vectors derived from different parameterizations of the same curve in R^3, specifically focusing on the twisted cubic. Participants explore whether these tangent vectors are identical at corresponding points on the curve.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present different parameterizations of the twisted cubic and calculate the corresponding tangent vectors. They question whether these vectors can be the same at specific points, considering the relationship between the parameters.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing calculations and questioning the implications of their results. Some suggest that while the tangent vectors may differ in magnitude, they point in the same direction, leading to a nuanced understanding of parameterization effects.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the relationship between the parameterizations and the points they generate on the curve. Participants note that different parameter values lead to different points, which raises questions about the validity of comparing tangent vectors directly. The idea of using arc length as a parameterization is also mentioned as a potential approach for further exploration.

ayalam
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Do different parametrizations of the same curve in R^3 result in identical tangent vectors at a given point on the same curve? Example may be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are two different parameterizations of the twisted cubic (a space curve):

r_1(t)=\left< t,t^2,t^3\right> ,\mbox{ for } 0\leq t\leq 2
and r_2(u)=\left< e^u,e^{2u},e^{3u}\right> ,\mbox{ for } 0\leq u\leq \ln 2

their parameters are related by t=e^u.

Try it.
 
I got for r(t) r'(t)=<1,2t,3t^2> and for r'(0)=<1,0,0>

But for r'(u)=<e^u,2e^2u,3e^3u> and r'(0)=<1,2,3>


So i would assume the answer would be no?
 
Sorry, I made a typo above: it should read

r_1(t)=\left&lt; t,t^2,t^3\right&gt; ,\mbox{ for } 1\leq t\leq 2

Since t=0 and u=0 generate different points on the curve in R^3, which are, r_1(0)=\left&lt; 0,0,0\right&gt;, and r_2(0)=\left&lt; 1,1,1\right&gt;, they shouldn't have the same tangent vectors.

But when evaluated at the same point on the curve, they should be the same, that is

r_1^{\prime}(t)=\left&lt; 1,2t,3t^2\right&gt; ,\mbox{ for } 1\leq t\leq 2
and r_2^{\prime}(u)=\left&lt; e^u,2e^{2u},3e^{3u}\right&gt; ,\mbox{ for } 0\leq u\leq \ln 2

Notice that the points generated by the parameterizations are related such that:
r_1\left( e^u\right) =r_2(u) /mbox{ and } r_2\left( \ln(t) \right) =r_1(t)

and hence the relations:r_1^{\prime}\left( e^u\right)e^u =r_2^{\prime}(u) /mbox{ and } r_2^{\prime}\left( \ln(t) \right) \frac{1}{t} =r_1^{\prime}(t) hold for the ranges 1\leq t\leq 2, 0\leq u\leq \ln 2

So, I suppose the answer to your question is: no, they're not the same, but there does exist some relation between them (these two, that is). I think... no, I can't figure it out. Different parameterizations of a curve, still describe the same curve, right? Hmmm. Geometry: try parameterizing w.r.t. arc length along the curve, see calculus book: try Stewart.
 
Sorry, I made a typo above: it should read

r_1(t)=\left&lt; t,t^2,t^3\right&gt; for 1 \leq t\leq 2

Since t=0 and u=0 generate different points on the curve in R^3, which are, r_1(0)=\left&lt; 0,0,0\right&gt;, and r_2(0)=\left&lt; 1,1,1\right&gt;, they shouldn't have the same tangent vectors.

But when evaluated at the same point on the curve, they should be the same, that is

r_1^{\prime}(t)=\left&lt; 1,2t,3t^2\right&gt; ,\mbox{ for } 1\leq t\leq 2
and r_2^{\prime}(u)=\left&lt; e^u,2e^{2u},3e^{3u}\right&gt; ,\mbox{ for } 0\leq u\leq \ln 2

Notice that the points generated by the parameterizations are related such that:

r_1\left( e^u\right) =r_2(u) /mbox{ and } r_2\left( \ln(t) \right) =r_1(t)

and hence the relations:

r_1^{\prime}\left( e^u\right)e^u =r_2^{\prime}(u) \mbox{ and } r_2^{\prime}\left( \ln(t) \right) \frac{1}{t} =r_1^{\prime}(t) hold for the ranges 1\leq t\leq 2, 0\leq u\leq \ln 2

So, I suppose the answer to your question is: no, they're not the same, but there does exist some relation between them (these two, that is). I think... no, I can't figure it out. Different parameterizations of a curve, still describe the same curve, right? Hmmm. Geometry: try parameterizing w.r.t. arc length along the curve, see calculus book: try Stewart.
 
Last edited:
One way of thinking about this is "dynamically". Think of an object moving along the curve with t equal to the time it is at each point. The "tangent" vector would then be the velocity vector of the object. Different parametrizations can be interpreted as objects moving along the same curve at different speeds. The tangent vector, for different parametrizations, will, of course, always point in the same direction but its length would be the speed. The length of the tangent vector may change for different parametrizations. If you want to be completely "geometric" you should use arclength as parametrization. That way the tangent vector always has length 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K