Parental Genetics for Type 0 Blood - Biology Question 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter f4d_girl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying potential parental combinations that could produce a child with type O blood. The participants analyze various blood type combinations using Punnett squares, emphasizing the significance of the alleles I, i, A, and B. It is clarified that "I" represents the dominant alleles for blood types A and B, while "i" represents the recessive allele for type O blood. The consensus leans towards options C and D as viable answers, with D being favored due to its ability to produce the ii genotype, which corresponds to type O blood. Overall, understanding the genetic inheritance of blood types is crucial for determining the correct parental combinations.
f4d_girl
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
8. Which of the following could be the parents of a child with type 0 blood?
A: IBIB X IBI B: IAIB X IBi
C: IAIB X ii D: IAi X IBi


I have not idea which one is the correct one help me please
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before we can help you, you need to put down your thoughts too. Then we can help steer you in a successful direction.

What do you know about those blood types? When you combine them in various combinations (AxA,AxB,Ax0,BxB,Bx0,0x0) what blood type (expression) will the offspring of these crosses have? Do you know how to use a Punnett Square?
 
Yes, i know how to use a Punnette square, and i do know the combintations.. the problem is that I don't understand what I or i stands for... nor B or b.. B must be a dominant gene nd b must be a recessive gene.. but gene of what? blood type O??
 
C and D seem like a correct answer, but i think D is the correct one.. because when i did the punette square, one of genotypes were ii which is type O.. am i on the right track?
 
Yes! :smile:

And here is another good reference
that addresses the I, i, A, B, O part of your question.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top