Parity dependence on the orbital quantum number (l)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
soccer_dude13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I know that the angular momentum eigenfunctions in spherical coordinates are spherical harmonics, Ylm ( [tex]\theta[/tex], [tex]\phi[/tex] ) [tex]\propto[/tex] (-1)mPlm(cos[tex]\theta[/tex])eim[tex]\phi[/tex].
Applying the parity operator to Ylm ( [tex]\theta,\phi[/tex] ) means that [tex]\theta[/tex] -> [tex]\pi[/tex] - [tex]\theta[/tex] and [tex]\phi[/tex] -> [tex]\phi[/tex] +[tex]\pi[/tex].
This implies that eim[tex]\phi[/tex] will pick up a (-1)m factor. However, from the definition of the Plm(cos[tex]\theta[/tex])'s I don't see how I can pick up a factor of (-1)l-2m in order to give parity the final correct dependence of (-1)l. In fact I don't see how we can creep up a dependence on l, at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider first the special case of the P_ll, i.e. the case with m=l. The P_ll are just the ordinary Legendre functions which are even polynomials in x=cos theta for even l and odd polynomials for odd l. The associated Legendre Polynomials P_lm contain m further derivatives with respect to x so that the odd/evenness changes with m.