Parity of function of multiple variables

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the parity of functions of multiple variables, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics. Participants explore how the concept of parity, typically defined for single-variable functions, can be applied or extended to functions involving multiple variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Wuhtzu questions how to determine the parity of the function f(x,z) = xz, noting that it satisfies both f(x,z) = f(-x,-z) and that the integral over a symmetric interval yields zero.
  • Some participants assert that parity is typically defined for functions of one variable, suggesting that the extension to multiple variables is not straightforward.
  • Others highlight the necessity of determining the parity of potentials in quantum mechanics, providing examples of functions that depend on multiple variables.
  • One participant mentions that changing the sign of all variables can be sufficient to classify a function as even, referencing a specific quantum mechanics problem involving matrix elements and selection rules.
  • Further elaboration on the implications of parity in quantum mechanics indicates that for non-zero integrals, the product of wavefunctions and the potential must be even, leading to restrictions on the parity of the states involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that parity is well-defined for single-variable functions but express uncertainty about its application to multiple-variable functions. There is no consensus on a definitive method for determining parity in this broader context.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the lack of a clear definition for parity in functions of multiple variables and the dependence on specific cases in quantum mechanics. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps regarding the implications of parity on quantum states.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those exploring the properties of potentials and their implications for wavefunctions and selection rules.

wuhtzu
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

I was wondering how to determine the parity of a function of multiple variables.

Say the function is:

[tex]f(x,z) = xz[/tex]

How would I determine its parity?

For the above function it is true that #1 f(x,z) = f(-x,-z) but its also true that #2 [tex]\int_{-a}^{a}\int_{-a}^{a}xz \dx \dz = 0[/tex].

In one variable functions #1 would indicate an even function and #2 would indicate an odd function. So I guess you cannot directly extend the concept of odd and even function from one variable to multiple variables?

The ultimate need to answer such question is to determine the parity of potentials in quantum mechanics :)

Best regards
Wuhtzu
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Parity is usually defined for functions of one variable.
 
That is correct, but it doesn't remove the need to determine the parity of potentials suchs as

V(x) = E*x
V(x,z) = c*x*z
V(z) = B*L

in quantum mechanics :( Most of them is easy because they are only dependent on one direction ie. one variable, but some, like v(x,z) = c*x*z, is dependent on more...
 
Parity (math term) is well defined for functions of one variable. I have never seen a definition for functions of more than one variable, other than for each variable separately.
 
I will post what ever answer we get when our quantum mechanics professor gets back from vacation.

Thank you for looking
 
So for this problem it turned out to be sufficient to just change sign of all variables, making it an even function.


The original problem if anyone is interested: Determine which matrix elements of the form

<n m l | V | n' m' l'> , n = n' = 2, m-m' = ? and l-l' = ?

was zero for a spherically symmetric quantum mechanical system by using selection rules.

The potential V was of the from V = x*z. The eigenstates of the spherically symmetric system has alternating even and odd parity with increasing l quantum number and the potential V = x*z is a rank k = 2 tensor.

This imposes the restriction [tex]l-l' = \Delta \le 2 \le 2[/tex].

Getting restrictions on m-m' is another story.

Thanks again.

Furthermore for [tex]<n m l | V | n' m' l'> \ne 0[/tex] the product of the wavefunctions <n m l | and |n' l' m'>, and the potential V has to be an even function - if it is odd it integrates to zero. Since we know that V is even both of the two wavefunctions (<n m l | or |n' m' l'>) have to have the same parity. Imposes futher restrictions on l-l' : [tex]\Delat l=0 , 2[/tex] since placing the l states 1 apart will cause one of them to be even and one of them to be odd (remember the alternating parity). But choosing l-'l = 0 or l-l'=2 causes both to be of the same parity which makes the total product even and hence the intergral non-zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K