Parity of [tex]^{9}_{5}B^{5}[/tex]

  • Thread starter Thread starter tirrel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parity
tirrel
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hy... I'm reviewing some nuclear physics but don't remember certain topics.

This exercise for example:

Knowing that ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and ^{9}_{5}B^{4} have both as quantum numbers \frac{3}{2}^{-} and their properties are determined by the odd nucleon, show that the ground state of ^{9}_{5}B^{5} can be \frac{3}^{+}.

My thinkings, which are correct?:

First of all we see that ^{9}_{5}B^{5} has as outermost nucleons the odd nucleon of ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and the odd nucleon of ^{9}_{5}B^{4}. So I=I_1+I_2, and thanks to the rules of q.m. I \in \{0,1,2,3\}. 3 is present and we are happy.
So for both ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and ^{9}_{5}B^{4} we have for the odd nucleon I=\frac{3}{2}. but thanks to the rules of angular momentum I=L+S and so since I=\frac{1}{2}, I \in \{l+\frac{1}{2},l-\frac{1}{2}\} and this forces l \in \{1,2\} , Now the parity is (-1)^l, so we are forced to have l=1 for both particles. I don't know is this is useful but I think is correct.
Now maybe we can say that the state in ^{9}_{5}B^{5} will be a superposition of vectors of the type v \otimes w, where the vector v refers to one nucleon and the vector w to the other. The parity on each member acts on each subspace: \Pi v \otimes w= \Pi_1 v \otimes \Pi w_2=(-1)^2v \otimes w. and so the parity is positive. This reasoning seem to tell that to find the parity I simply have to multplicate the parities of the individual nucleons. is it right? sounds strange...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ehm... the firs messag behaves strange and I'm not able to modify it... can you delete and leave only the second?:


Hy... I'm reviewing some nuclear physics but don't remember certain topics.

This exercise for example:

Knowing that ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and ^{9}_{5}B^{4} have both as quantum numbers \frac{3}{2}^{-} and their properties are determined by the odd nucleon, show that the ground state of ^{9}_{5}B^{5} can be 3^{+}.

My thinkings, which are correct?:

First of all we see that ^{9}_{5}B^{5} has as outermost nucleons the odd nucleon of ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and the odd nucleon of ^{9}_{5}B^{4}. So I=I_1+I_2, and thanks to the rules of q.m. I \in \{0,1,2,3\}. 3 is present and we are happy.
\\
\\
\\
\\
For both ^{9}_{4}Be^{5} and ^{9}_{5}B^{4} we have for the odd nucleon I=\frac{3}{2}. but thanks to the rules of angular momentum I=L+S and so since S=\frac{1}{2}, I \in \{l+\frac{1}{2},l-\frac{1}{2}\} and this forces l \in \{1,2\} , Now the parity is (-1)^l, so we are forced to have l=1 for both particles. I don't know is this is useful but I think is correct.
\\
\\
\\
\\
Now maybe we can say that the state in ^{9}_{5}B^{5} will be a superposition of vectors of the type v \otimes w, where the vector v refers to one nucleon and the vector w to the other. The parity on each member acts on each subspace: \Pi v \otimes w= \Pi_1 v \otimes \Pi_2 w=(-1)^2v \otimes w. and so the parity is positive. This reasoning seem to tell that to find the parity I simply have to multplicate the parities of the individual nucleons. is it right? sounds strange...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top