Partial derivative of integral with variable limit

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



G(\theta, k ) = \int^{\theta}_0 g(x,k) dx

\frac{\partial G}{\partial \theta} = ?

\frac{\partial G}{\partial k} = ?

The Attempt at a Solution



If I say that \int g(x,k) dx = H(x,k)

\int^{\theta}_0 g(x,k) dx = H(\theta,k) - H(0,k)


Then is \frac{\partial G}{\partial \theta} = \frac{\partial H(\theta,k)}{\partial \theta}=g(\theta,k)
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup.
 
That is "correct" but your derivation is more complicated than necessary! By the fundamental theorem of calculus, the derivative with respect to \theta is just g(\theta, k).

Lagrange's formula is an extension of the fundamental theorem of calculus:
\frac{d}{dx}\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} f(x, t) dt= f(x, \beta(x))}\frac{d\beta}{dx}- f(x, \alpha(x))\frac{d\alpha}{dx}+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dt.

Since \theta only appears in the upper limit of the integral, the derivative with respect to \theta is just
f(\theta, k)\frac{d\theta}{d\theta}= f(\theta, k)

and the derivative with respect to k is just
\int_0^\theta \frac{\partial f}{\partial k} dx
 
That's clearer now, thank you.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top