Partial Derivative of Van der Waals Equation

Scharles
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Given that the Van Der Waals equation is (p + (an^2)/v^2)(v-nb)=nRT where n,a,R and b are constants...

How to we find the derivative of p wrt v ?

How to find the derivative of p wrt T without further differentiation ??

Can anyone teach me how to do this question ?

Sincerly thanks~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scharles said:
Given that the Van Der Waals equation is (p + (an^2)/v^2)(v-nb)=nRT where n,a,R and b are constants...

How to we find the derivative of p wrt v ?

How to find the derivative of p wrt T without further differentiation ??

Can anyone teach me how to do this question ?

Sincerely thanks~
What have you tried?

Where are you stuck ?
 
i have no idea on how to solving this...
please kindly teach me how to start on solving this sort of question...
 
Do you know the difference between an implicit function and an explicit one ? What do you know about the derivatives for explicit functions ? How about implicit ones ?
 
Scharles said:
i have no idea on how to solving this...
please kindly teach me how to start on solving this sort of question...

If I had an equation:

y(x)+x=k

and I wanted to take the derivative of y with respect to x, I'd get:

y'(x)+1=0

Ok, not too bad.

Suppose I had:

y(x)+\frac{1}{x^2}=k

still not too bad if I want the derivative of y with respect to x. That's:

y'-2x^{-3}=0

How about:

(y(x)+\frac{c}{x^2})(x-k)=a

That's still not too bad cus' I'd use the chain rule this time:

(y(x)+\frac{c}{x^2}) \frac{d}{dx} (x-k)+(x-k)\frac{d}{dx}(y(x)+\frac{c}{x^2})=0

and that's:

(y(x)+\frac{c}{x^2})(1)+(x-k)(y'(x)-2cx^{-3})=0

ok, now you do one but instead of y(x), I'll say:

(p(v)+\frac{k}{v^2})(v-c)=a

and I want to take the derivative of p with respect to v. Do that one, then do yours with all the other parameters.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top