qspeechc
- 839
- 15
Hi.
So I'm reading a physics book and I come across the following passage:
Ok, up to this point I'm fairly confident I'm following along. But then they do the following:
and I have no idea where this comes from. I am guessing here that p_i=\phi _i(q) is only in some sufficiently small region and not the entire space, since they do not explicitly say anything in this regard, so that p_i-\phi _i is not identically zero on the whole space, so I do not know where the above comes from. This is probably something really simple and I'm just being stupid, but any help is greatly appreciated.
So I'm reading a physics book and I come across the following passage:
Let p=(p_1,p_2,...,p_n) and q=(q_1,q_2,...,q_n) and the system of n algebraic equations
g_r(p,q)=0, \quad r\in \{1,2,...,n\}
can be solved with respect to the p_i in the form p_i=\phi _i(q) for i\in \{1,2,...,n\}
Then we have
\frac{d}{dq_h}g_r(\phi ,q)=0
where \phi =(\phi _1,...,\phi _n). If we denote G_r(q)=g_r(\phi ,q) then the last relation gives
0=\frac{\partial}{\partial q_h}G_s = \Big[\frac{\partial g_s}{\partial q_h} + \sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\partial g_s}{\partial p_i}\frac{\partial \phi _i}{\partial q_h} \Big]_{p=\phi (q)}
Ok, up to this point I'm fairly confident I'm following along. But then they do the following:
Therefore the partial derivatives can be expressed in the form
\frac{\partial g_s}{\partial q_h} = \sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\partial g_s}{\partial p_i}\frac{\partial (p_i-\phi _i)}{\partial q_h}
and I have no idea where this comes from. I am guessing here that p_i=\phi _i(q) is only in some sufficiently small region and not the entire space, since they do not explicitly say anything in this regard, so that p_i-\phi _i is not identically zero on the whole space, so I do not know where the above comes from. This is probably something really simple and I'm just being stupid, but any help is greatly appreciated.
Last edited: