Partial Derivatives: Solving y^2=uy-v

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the partial derivative of the equation y^2 = uy - v with respect to u, particularly why there is no (dv/du) term despite u and v being interdependent. It is clarified that u, v, and y are treated as independent variables in this context, allowing for the use of partial derivatives. The notation used in the equation is critiqued for lacking specificity, which can lead to misunderstandings about the relationships between the variables. The conversation emphasizes the importance of defining the function's domain clearly to avoid ambiguity in mathematical expressions. Overall, the need for precise notation and understanding of variable independence is highlighted in the context of partial derivatives.
theleftside
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey,

Little confused by something:

if we have u=x+y and v=xy what is the partial derivative w.r.t. u of

y^2=uy-v

I am told it is 2y (dy/du) = u (dy/du) + y

And I can see where these terms come from. What I don't understand is why there is no (dv/du) term, as v and u aren't independent.

Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The variables x and y have been exchanged with u and v:They are the independent variables, and y is a function of them, y(u,v).
Any function f(u,v) have partial derivatives with respect to u and with respect to v, but the derivatives of u or v with respect to each other is zero.
 
Definition: A function f is said to be a function of the independent variables (a, b, c) if specifying a, b, c fully determines f (but not overdetermine: i.e. specification of all the three a, b, c are necessary for the determination of f; non-specification of anyone of the a, b, c will leave f undetermined). This is our so called 'CONSTRUCTION'. Also, a, b, c are said to be independent variables.

Now, take y^2 be z. Then z=z(u, v, y) - as per the definition above, and all three, i.e. u, v, y are independent (as per above). Don't go by 'u=x+y and v=xy' to conclude that u and v aren't independent.

Also, I don't think it's correct to write y=y(u,v), since specification of u, v doesn't fully determine y (it's a quadratic equation-hence two roots)
ehild said:
and y is a function of them, y(u,v).
But, y^2=y^2(u, v, y) is correct, since y^2 is fully determined by u, v and y.
 
Sashwat Tanay said:
Definition: A function f is said to be a function of the independent variables (a, b, c) if specifying a, b, c fully determines f (but not overdetermine: i.e. specification of all the three a, b, c are necessary for the determination of f; non-specification of anyone of the a, b, c will leave f undetermined). This is our so called 'CONSTRUCTION'. Also, a, b, c are said to be independent variables.

Now, take y^2 be z. Then z=z(u, v, y) - as per the definition above, and all three, i.e. u, v, y are independent (as per above). Don't go by 'u=x+y and v=xy' to conclude that u and v aren't independent.

Also, I don't think it's correct to write y=y(u,v), since specification of u, v doesn't fully determine y (it's a quadratic equation-hence two roots)

But, y^2=y^2(u, v, y) is correct, since y^2 is fully determined by u, v and y.
is it not overdetermined?
 
  • Like
Likes Sashwat Tanay
I see. True.
By the way, can we even legitimately talk of partial derivative of y^2=uy-v wrt u? Before doing that, we I think we should decide our independent variables on which y^2 depends.
Also, in
theleftside said:
I am told it is 2y (dy/du) = u (dy/du) + y
'dy/du' indicates a total derivative, so y should be fully determined by u. But we see, it's not.
 
theleftside said:
what is the partial derivative w.r.t. u of

y^2=uy-v

We could equally well ask: What is the partial derivative of y^2 with repsect to v ?

This general type of confusion often occurs in physics problems. Authors establish a complicated relation between several variables and then write a total differential that seems to be missing some partial derivatives. I conjecture the problem lies in ambiguous notation. The notation y^2 = uy - v does not specify the function y^2 as being a function of particular variables. A correct mathematical definition of a function states a particular domain for a function. A relation like y^2 = uy - v does not.

The "given" information to determine a value of a mathematical function is specified by a vector of values for specific variables. The value of the left hand side of an equation might be determined from a variety of information about the right hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes Sashwat Tanay
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top