Partial differentiation and partial derivatives

Tabiri
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If ##xs^2 + yt^2 = 1## (1) and ##x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4,## (2) find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}## at ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)##.

Homework Equations



Pretty much those just listed above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so I spent quite a while on this one. First of all, I took the differentials of both the equations, (1) and (2), and came up with $$s^2\,dx + 2sx\,ds + t^2\,dy + 2ty\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$ 2xs\,dx + x^2\,ds + 2yt\,dy + y^2\,dt = y\,dx + x\,dy$$ for (2).

Then, substituting in ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)## for the respective variables I came up with $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$4\,dx + \,ds + 6\,dy + 9\,dt = -3\,dx + \,dy$$ for (2).

Simplifying and moving things around a bit, I got $$ 4\,dx + 4\,ds = -\,dy - 6\,dt $$ for (1) and $$ 7\,dx + \,ds = -5\,dy - 9\,dt $$ for (2).

Then I used Cramer's Rule to solve these two equations for ##\,dx## and ##\,ds.##. For ##\,dx## I got $$ \,dx = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
-\,dy - 6\,dt & 4 \\
-5\,dy - 9\,dt & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}

= \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 4(5\,dy + 9\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 20\,dy + 36\,dt}{-24} = \frac{19\,dy + 30\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-19\,dy - 30\,dt}{24}$$

$$ \,ds = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & -\,dy - 6\,dt \\
7 & -5\,dy - 9\,dt
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
} = \frac{4(-5\,dy - 9\,dt) + 7(\,dy + 6\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-20\,dy - 36\,dt + 7\,dy + 42\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-13\,dy + 6\,dt}{-24} = \frac{13\,dy - 6\,dt}{24}.
$$

Then I changed the equations around to $$\,dy + 6\,dt = -4\,dx - 4\,ds$$ for (1) and $$5\,dy + 9\,dt = -7\,dx - \,ds$$ for (2). Using Cramer's Rule again to solve for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## I got
$$\,dy = \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21}$$
$$\,dt = \frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}.$$

Then I wanted to find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##, so I took what I got for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## plugged it into (1), ##4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0,## and got $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21} + 6(\frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}) = 0.$$ Multiplying this all out, everything just cancels to zero and I can't find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##. I've checked the math for the applications of Cramer's Rule and can't find anything wrong there, so... what am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tabiri said:

Homework Statement



If ##xs^2 + yt^2 = 1## (1) and ##x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4,## (2) find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}## at ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)##.



Homework Equations



Pretty much those just listed above.



The Attempt at a Solution



Alright so I spent quite a while on this one. First of all, I took the differentials of both the equations, (1) and (2), and came up with $$s^2\,dx + 2sx\,ds + t^2\,dy + 2ty\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$ 2xs\,dx + x^2\,ds + 2yt\,dy + y^2\,dt = y\,dx + x\,dy$$ for (2).

Then, substituting in ##(x,y,s,t) = (1,-3,2,-1)## for the respective variables I came up with $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0 $$ for (1) and $$4\,dx + \,ds + 6\,dy + 9\,dt = -3\,dx + \,dy$$ for (2).

Simplifying and moving things around a bit, I got $$ 4\,dx + 4\,ds = -\,dy - 6\,dt $$ for (1) and $$ 7\,dx + \,ds = -5\,dy - 9\,dt $$ for (2).

Then I used Cramer's Rule to solve these two equations for ##\,dx## and ##\,ds.##. For ##\,dx## I got $$ \,dx = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
-\,dy - 6\,dt & 4 \\
-5\,dy - 9\,dt & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
}

= \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 4(5\,dy + 9\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-\,dy - 6\,dt + 20\,dy + 36\,dt}{-24} = \frac{19\,dy + 30\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-19\,dy - 30\,dt}{24}$$

$$ \,ds = \frac{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & -\,dy - 6\,dt \\
7 & -5\,dy - 9\,dt
\end{vmatrix}
}{
\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 4 \\
7 & 1
\end{vmatrix}
} = \frac{4(-5\,dy - 9\,dt) + 7(\,dy + 6\,dt)}{-24} = \frac{-20\,dy - 36\,dt + 7\,dy + 42\,dt}{-24} = \frac{-13\,dy + 6\,dt}{-24} = \frac{13\,dy - 6\,dt}{24}.
$$

Then I changed the equations around to $$\,dy + 6\,dt = -4\,dx - 4\,ds$$ for (1) and $$5\,dy + 9\,dt = -7\,dx - \,ds$$ for (2). Using Cramer's Rule again to solve for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## I got
$$\,dy = \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21}$$
$$\,dt = \frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}.$$

Then I wanted to find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##, so I took what I got for ##\,dy## and ##\,dt## plugged it into (1), ##4\,dx + 4\,ds + \,dy + 6\,dt = 0,## and got $$4\,dx + 4\,ds + \frac{-6\,dx + 30\,ds}{21} + 6(\frac{-13\,dx - 19\,ds}{21}) = 0.$$ Multiplying this all out, everything just cancels to zero and I can't find ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}##. I've checked the math for the applications of Cramer's Rule and can't find anything wrong there, so... what am I doing wrong?

I cannot understand what you are trying to do, or why you want to do it. The easiest way is just to differentiate directly. Letting ##x_s = \partial x/\partial s##, etc, we have:
(1) \Longrightarrow s^2 x_s + 2 s x + t^2 y_s = 0 \\<br /> (2) \Longrightarrow x^2 + 2 s x x_s + 2 t y y_s = x y_s + y x_s<br />
which you can solve for ##x_s,y_s##. It is much easier if you first substitute in the numerical values of ##x,y,s,t##.
 
As in solve for ##y_s## in (1) and then plug that value for ##y_s## into (2)?

Edit: Also, I know that the answer for ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}## is ##\frac{-19}{13}##
 
Tabiri said:
As in solve for ##y_s## in (1) and then plug that value for ##y_s## into (2)?

Edit: Also, I know that the answer for ##\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}## is ##\frac{-19}{13}##

You have two equations in the two unknowns ##x_s, y_s##, and these equations are linear in these unknowns. They happen to be nonlinear in ##s,t,x,y##, but that does not matter, since we are already given numerical values for them. The things we don't know are ##x_s, y_s## and ##x_t,y_t##.
 
Yeah, I just did it that way and got the right answer. Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top