Partial Mossbauer effect—Why not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimgraber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial
jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
A photon can be absorbed by a crystal. The recoil is absorbed by either a single atom (ordinary absorption) or by the entire crystal (Mossbauer effect) Why do we not observe absorption by two or three atoms at the small end or by one half or one third of the crystal at the high end?
TIA.
Jim Graber
 
  • Like
Likes edpell
Physics news on Phys.org
Gamma radiation involves kicking out a photon, so by conservation of momentum some momentum has to be imparted to the thing that emitted it. However, in a crystal, momentum can be absorbed into lattice vibrations as phonons. The latter are quantised in energy and momentum, so there is a possibility of no phonons being excited. If you were to manage to excite one or two phonons I guess that would correspond to your case of partial Mossbauer effect? The only problem is that phonons carry *much* more momentum than photons, so even one or two may cause sufficient broadening for the effect to be described as effectively having disappeared.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top