Partial with respect to ln(f(x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheBestMilk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Partial
TheBestMilk
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working a problem, and I've come to taking the derivative with respect to ln(x):

\frac{\partial ln(x^{c})}{\partial ln(p_{x})}


Homework Equations



ln(x^{c})=ln(p^{2}_{y}I)+ln(p_{x}+p_{y})-ln(p_{x})-ln(p_{y})


The Attempt at a Solution


I've worked it out, but am not sure how the ln(p_{x}+p_{y}) term would derive with respect to ln(p_{x}). Any help would be great. Thanks!

\frac{\partial ln(x^{c})}{\partial ln(p_{x})} = \frac{\partial}{\partial ln(p_{x})}(ln(p_{x}+p_{y})) - 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably you can use the chain rule here, finding a convenient "intermediate" variable, e.g.

<br /> \frac{\partial \ln(p_x + p_y)}{\partial \ln(p_x)} = <br /> \frac{\partial \ln(p_x + p_y)}{\partial p_x} \cdot<br /> \frac{\partial p_x}{\partial \ln(p_x)} <br />

looks like I could do it
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top