Particle Accelerator Project: Building a Linear Accelerator or Cyclotron

rsilva.pt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm interested in building a particle accelerator... maybe a linear accelerator or a cyclotron.

What do you suggest as a starting project? The linear accelerator or the cyclotron?

About the linear accelerator, is it suitable only for electrons? Is it possible to build a small (and affordable) linear accelerator capable of accelerating heavier charged particles?

And about the cyclotron... is it too expensive and complex as a first accelerator project? What would be the cost of a small cyclotron?

I'd like to contact other accelerator enthusiasts who could help me.

Thank you :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Building an accelerator is dangerous. It's clear from your message that you don't know enough to build one successfully or safely. I'd recommend another project.
 
Hello, I agree with Vanadium 50.
However, old CRT televisions do accelerate electrons so they are infact linear electron accelerators. For the record: a linear accelerator would be far far easier to make.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Building an accelerator is dangerous. It's clear from your message that you don't know enough to build one successfully or safely. I'd recommend another project.

I'm aware that it is complex and dangerous... I've worked with a Van de Graaff accelerator before to perform some RBS studies when attending to a Nuclear Safety course.

I have no technical knowledge to build an affordable accelerator. That is why I'm asking for help.
 
rsilva.pt said:
Hi!

I'm interested in building a particle accelerator... maybe a linear accelerator or a cyclotron.

What do you suggest as a starting project? The linear accelerator or the cyclotron?

About the linear accelerator, is it suitable only for electrons? Is it possible to build a small (and affordable) linear accelerator capable of accelerating heavier charged particles?

And about the cyclotron... is it too expensive and complex as a first accelerator project? What would be the cost of a small cyclotron?

I'd like to contact other accelerator enthusiasts who could help me.

Thank you :)

rsilva.pt said:
I'm aware that it is complex and dangerous... I've worked with a Van de Graaff accelerator before to perform some RBS studies when attending to a Nuclear Safety course.

I have no technical knowledge to build an affordable accelerator. That is why I'm asking for help.

As explained, we do not give advice on dangerous projects here at the PF. Thread is closed.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
6K
Back
Top