Particle Decay Mode Percentages

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
Hi everyone,

I find the following table from WolframAlpha concerning the probability of various decay modes of the pion \pi^{+}.

My question is: Are these probabilities calculated, or are they numbers from numerous experiments?

Thanks,
 

Attachments

  • pion decay percentages.gif
    pion decay percentages.gif
    11.9 KB · Views: 526
Physics news on Phys.org
In principle, such decay rates can be calculated using Fermi's Golden Rule, which consists of two main components: the transition matrix element, which can be calculated using Feynman diagrams, and the phase space factor, which roughly corresponds to how many possibilities exist for the final state. (see p. 204 of Griffiths' book)

To understand the branching ratios in the case of the pion, you have to be familiar with the weak interaction, especially the concept of helicity. Kinematically, the electron channel should be favoured. Actually, the muon channel is favoured. You can read about it in Griffiths, p. 321.
 
Those are measurements. If they were calculations, the last two entries would have numbers and not limits.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Those are measurements. If they were calculations, the last two entries would have numbers and not limits.

Thanks, I should have been a little more specific in my question, I was really wondering what kith answered. That is, "is there a calculation such that the result says 'you get such-and-such decay mode 99.9% of the time, etc...' ?"

and it appears there is.
 
Not exactly. You can calculate the partial widths for various decays, but to get the branching fraction you need to divide that by the sum of all the partial widths of all possible decays.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top