Combinatus
- 40
- 1
Distance of parabola from a given plane
A particle has the position P(t) = (1,t,t^2) at time t. Determine a formula for its distance to the plane 3x+2y+z=1. For what value of t is the particle closest to the plane?
I'm not perfectly sure why my solution doesn't seem to work. It gets pretty close to the solution, and I don't think I've messed up the arithmetic along the way, so there should be some lack of conceptual understanding that causes it.
Anyway, first off, a normal vector to the plane is n=(3,2,1).
Choosing an arbitrary point in the plane, say, O = (0,0,1), it is realized that \vec{OP} = \vec{v} + sn where v is a vector parallel to the plane, and sn, for some value of s, is the distance from a point on the plane to the point P on the parabola that describes the path of the particle.
We then get \vec{v} = \vec{OP} - sn = (1,t,t^2-1) - (3s,2s,s) = (1-3s,t-2s,t^2-1-s). Since \vec{v} is parallel to the plane, its coordinates satisfy the equation of the plane. Thus, 3(1-3s) + 2(t-2s) + t^2 - 1 - s = 1, which can be simplified to s = (1/14) \cdot (t^2 + 2t + 1).
Using this value of s in sn yields that the vector from the plane to the point P is (1/14) \cdot (3t^2 + 6t + 3, 2t^2 + 4t + 2, t^2 + 2t + 1). The absolute value of this vector is then, after simplifying, (t+1)^2, which should be the sought distance.
Turns out that it isn't. The actual distance is supposedly given by \frac{t^2 + 2t + 2}{\sqrt{14}}. I suppose I could just try to project \vec{OP} onto n straight away, but I don't see what exactly it is that makes my aforementioned approach fail.
I'm inclined to guess that it has something to do with the parameter s being fixed on some particular value, thus not making it possible to write it in terms of another parameter.
Ideas are welcome!
Homework Statement
A particle has the position P(t) = (1,t,t^2) at time t. Determine a formula for its distance to the plane 3x+2y+z=1. For what value of t is the particle closest to the plane?
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
I'm not perfectly sure why my solution doesn't seem to work. It gets pretty close to the solution, and I don't think I've messed up the arithmetic along the way, so there should be some lack of conceptual understanding that causes it.
Anyway, first off, a normal vector to the plane is n=(3,2,1).
Choosing an arbitrary point in the plane, say, O = (0,0,1), it is realized that \vec{OP} = \vec{v} + sn where v is a vector parallel to the plane, and sn, for some value of s, is the distance from a point on the plane to the point P on the parabola that describes the path of the particle.
We then get \vec{v} = \vec{OP} - sn = (1,t,t^2-1) - (3s,2s,s) = (1-3s,t-2s,t^2-1-s). Since \vec{v} is parallel to the plane, its coordinates satisfy the equation of the plane. Thus, 3(1-3s) + 2(t-2s) + t^2 - 1 - s = 1, which can be simplified to s = (1/14) \cdot (t^2 + 2t + 1).
Using this value of s in sn yields that the vector from the plane to the point P is (1/14) \cdot (3t^2 + 6t + 3, 2t^2 + 4t + 2, t^2 + 2t + 1). The absolute value of this vector is then, after simplifying, (t+1)^2, which should be the sought distance.
Turns out that it isn't. The actual distance is supposedly given by \frac{t^2 + 2t + 2}{\sqrt{14}}. I suppose I could just try to project \vec{OP} onto n straight away, but I don't see what exactly it is that makes my aforementioned approach fail.
I'm inclined to guess that it has something to do with the parameter s being fixed on some particular value, thus not making it possible to write it in terms of another parameter.
Ideas are welcome!
Last edited: