How Is the Particle Horizon Distance Calculated in a Universe with Dark Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the particle horizon distance in a universe characterized by dark energy, specifically with parameters Ω_M=0.25 and ω=-1. Participants emphasize the need to derive the scale factor a(t) from the Friedmann equations, as the simplified model used does not apply to scenarios with non-zero dark matter density. The first Friedmann equation is highlighted as essential for establishing the relationship between the Hubble parameter and the density parameters. A numerical integration approach is suggested to solve for a(t) and subsequently calculate the particle horizon distance. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying cosmological equations to obtain accurate results.
June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Numerically integrate and report the particle horizon distance today for the currently fa-
vored model \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25,\omega=-1. Assume the scaled Hubble constant to be h = 0.72, and report the particle horizon in billions of lyr (Gyr).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Horizen distance d=\int_0^{t0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}, so in a flat universe a(t)=(t/t0)^{2/(3(1+3\omega))},
so that we have $$d=\frac{2}{1+3\omega}H_0^{-1}$$,but this has nothing to do with \Omega_M=1-\Omega_{DE}=0.25?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
 
phyzguy said:
The a(t) \propto t^{\frac{2}{3}} result is only true for a flat universe with \Omega_{DM} =0. You need to review the Friedmann equations for the case with \Omega_{DM} \neq 0.
Oh that's right! So how do I derive a(t) from Friedmann equations?
 
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
 
phyzguy said:
Well, can you write down the first Friedmann equation for H in terms of the Ω parameters? Once you have done that, remember that H = \frac {\dot a}{a}. Then you should be able to write a differential equation for a that you can numerically integrate.
Thank you! So that would be \frac{H^2}{H_0^2}=\frac{0.25}{a^3}+0.75,if we combine this with H=\frac{\dot{a}}{a} and I solved this equation (online), it gave me http://www4f.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP226920fg7hgi3c9658be000033830f2a7886e3e4?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=20&w=550.&h=47. ? (a(x) means a(t) here). I think this isn't right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top