Particle in a mag field with linear drag

AI Thread Summary
A particle with mass m and charge q is influenced by a uniform magnetic field and a linear drag force. The discussion involves deriving the equations of motion in the x and y directions using the Lorentz force law, where gravity is considered negligible. The participant expresses confusion about linking the equations to time functions and seeks clarification on whether to incorporate time in the initial calculations. Ultimately, they resolve their confusion and find the solution to the problem. The conversation highlights the application of complex variables to analyze the particle's velocity over time.
Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m and electric charge q>0 is subject to a uniform, constant mag field of \vec{B} = B \hat{k}. At t=0 its velocity vector is \hat{v}naught which lies in the x-y plane. The particle is also subject to a linear drag force fd=-b\vec{v}

a)Draw a free body diagram showing all the forces action on the particle. Use this to find expressions for F=ma in the x and y directions respectively, assuming that the force of gravity is negligible.

b) Use the equations from part a) and the complex variable technique discussed in class (see also taylor, section 2.5) to solve for the complex velocity n(t)= vx+ivy as a function of time, in terms of the initial condition \vec{v}naught

c) use your solution to part b) to find an expression for the particle's speed as a function of time.

hate that my prof links the questions...


Homework Equations



\omega = \frac{qB}{m}

ay = -\omega v_{x}

ax = \omega v_{y}

-bv = \beta Dv


The Attempt at a Solution



Lorentz force law where E=0 qvxb = qB{i j k}{vx vy 0}{0 0 k}

=qB(vyi - vxj)


F = ma = qB(vyi - vxj) - b(vyi - vxj)

after some shuffling around dividing by mass subbing in ay and ax

[1-(b/m\omega)]*[ ay + ax ] = a

multiply by mass

F= ma = [m - (b/\omega)]* [ ay + ax ]

I'm not sure if i was supposed to make this a function of t or if that is with part b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone have an idea?
 
ehild your a smart guy. want to help a guy out?
 
I figured it out, needed to clear my head and it was easy
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top