Particle in infinite well which is suddenly expanded

Phyisab****
Messages
584
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Well I thought this problem was easy, turned in the homework and got it wrong. My prof is hard to get help from, so hopefully someone here can help me out. A particle is in a one dimensional infinite square well with walls at x=0 and x=L. At time t=0 the well is expanded to width 2L. What is the probability the particle will be in the nth stationary state of the expanded well? I bet a lot of people have seen this before apparently it's a pretty popular problem.

Homework Equations

\left\langle\Psi_{f}\left|\Psi_{i}\right\rangle = d_{n}

The Attempt at a Solution



=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{L}\int sin(\frac{n \pi x}{2 L})sin(\frac{\pi x}{L})dx

So I'm pretty sure I'm right so far, and the problem is just to evaluate the integral. I was sure the solution was

d_{n}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} if n=2

d_{n}= 0 if n not = 2

But apparently the answer is

d_{n}= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} if n=2
d_{n}= \frac{4}{\pi}\frac{1}{(n^{2}-4} if n is odd
d_{n}= 0 otherwise

I can plug the integral into mathematica and of course it gives me the right answer. But I have seen integrals like this hundreds of times in solving PDE's, and they always go like I first thought. What is the difference here? This is causing me a ridiculous amount of cognitive dissonance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the sines has a 2L in the denominator while the other has just L. That's the difference.
 
The integral is the Fourier transform of the sin(\frac{\pi x}{L}) in the new well.
From your result, I guess the initial wave function may not be the ground state of the of the old well (sin(\frac{\pi x}{L}))
or your integral use a different domain (note the integration from 0 to L is different from 0 to 2L) because the wavefunction is 0 within L to 2L
I have not tried it though.
 
kuruman said:
One of the sines has a 2L in the denominator while the other has just L. That's the difference.

I realize that. I just don't see why it makes any difference. For n=8 there might as well be a 4 in the numerator and just L in the denominator. How the heck do I explicitly evaluate this so I can prove the answer to myself?
 
If your problem is evaluating the integral, first substitute θ = πx/L and convert the sines to exponentials. Then

sin(n\theta/2)sin(\theta)=-\frac{(e^{i n\theta/2}-e^{-i n\theta/2})(e^{i \theta}-e^{-i \theta})}{4}

Multiply out the terms and you will get four integrals that look like

\int^{\pi}_0 e^{i(n/2+1)\theta}d\theta=\left[ \frac{e^{i(n/2+1)\theta}}{i(n/2+1)}\right]^{\pi}_0

or, after you multiply out the terms you should be able to recognize sines and/or cosines and integrate them.

In either case, eventually, you should be able to combine the answer to a real number and the role of the 2 in the denominator should become obvious.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top