Particle Motion: Retardation & Arithmetic Progression

AI Thread Summary
The particle's speed is defined as v = k/x, indicating that its retardation is inversely proportional to x^3, resulting in the expression -k^2 * x^(-3). To find the retardation, the chain rule can be applied to express acceleration in terms of velocity and position. For the second part, the distances between points a, b, c, and d are equal, and the time taken to traverse these distances can be shown to increase in arithmetic progression by calculating time as distance divided by velocity. The discussion emphasizes the use of calculus and algebraic manipulation to derive the necessary relationships. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Cbray
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle moves in a straight line away from a fixed point O in the line, such that when its distance from O is x its speed v is given by v=k/x , for some constant k.

(a) show that the particle has a retardation which is inversely proportional to x3
The answer is -k2*x-3

(b) if a,b,c,d are points in that order on the straight line, such that the distances ab, bc, cd are all equal, show that the times taken to travel these successive distances increase in arithmetic progression.

Homework Equations


Possible the answer to the first one comes into relevance, -k2*x-3


The Attempt at a Solution


let the four points have x coordinates
x, x+xo , x+2xo , x+3xo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a) how would you find the retardation ? (negative acceleration)

(Hint: use the chain rule to express 'a' in terms of 'v' and 'x')

For part b) try finding time based on t= distance/velocity at the given points.
 
rock.freak667 said:
For part a) how would you find the retardation ? (negative acceleration)

(Hint: use the chain rule to express 'a' in terms of 'v' and 'x')

For part b) try finding time based on t= distance/velocity at the given points.

I still can't figure it out :L
 
Cbray said:
I still can't figure it out :L

If a=dv/dt, can you use the chain rule to re-write this in terms of v and x? (Hint: you will have to have a dv/dx term)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top