Particle on a ring with perturbation

["pi"mp]

So I'm trying to solve old qualifying exam problems, one of which is a particle on a ring with a constant electric field perturbation. The un-perturbed problem is straightforward, and we then add a constant electric field in the x-direction (the ring lies in the xy-plane) of magnitude E. Therefore, we add -ReE \cos \phi as a perturbing term to the Hamiltonian. R is the radius of the ring and phi is the angular coordinate on the ring.

We then ask for the first (non-zero) energy correction to the original ground state. Because of the cosine term, the first order correction vanishes, I believe, so we need to look to second order or beyond.

However, the second order correction involved a sum of terms of the form:

\langle \psi_{k} | H_{1} | \psi_{0} \rangle =\alpha \int_{0}^{2 \pi} d \phi e^{ik \phi} \cos \phi

Unless I'm screwing up badly, I believe the above terms are also zero. So am I making a mistake here? Or am I correct and I need to look for third order corrections to get a non-zero term?

 

[The_Duck]

I don't think this integral is zero for all $k$. Write $\cos \phi = (e^{i\phi} + e^{-i\phi})/2$.

 

["pi"mp]

No? I agree it certainly isn't zero in general, but k must be an integer thanks to the periodic boundary conditions on the un-perturbed eigenfunctions. Won't it always vanish when k is an integer? Thanks a lot.

 

["pi"mp]

Oh wait...it doesn't vanish for k=1, right? It will vanish for all other integral values of k?

 

[Delta2]

It doesn't vanish for k=-1 as well but negative integers are out of play anyway.

 

["pi"mp]

Awesome, thank you. So the point is that the infinite sum which is, in general, required for the 2nd order perturbation correction, simply contains one term?

 

[The_Duck]

It doesn't vanish for k=-1 as well but negative integers are out of play anyway.

No, you have to consider negative integers too; $e^{ik\phi}$ and $e^{-ik\phi}$ are both energy eigenstates of the unperturbed system.

Awesome, thank you. So the point is that the infinite sum which is, in general, required for the 2nd order perturbation correction, simply contains one term?

Two terms; see above.

 

["pi"mp]

But since those two distinct eigenfunctions have the same energy, I would need to use the degenerate version of 2nd order perturbation?