Constant Solutions of Real Scalar Field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constant solutions of a self-interacting real scalar field described by a specific equation of motion. Participants explore the implications of these solutions, particularly focusing on the conditions under which nonzero constant solutions exist and their physical significance, as well as the stability of these solutions in the context of quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the trivial solution is ##\phi(x,t) = 0##, but suggests there may be two additional constant solutions depending on the parameters ##A##, ##B##, and ##m##.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of the requirement that operators do not go to zero as ##\mathbf{x} \rightarrow \infty##, drawing a comparison to wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the field can be interpreted as a classical field, indicating that normalizability may not be a necessary condition for such fields.
  • One participant discusses the implications of the quadratic term on the right side of the equation, stating it modifies the mass and must be nonnegative for a physical theory, while also mentioning the potential unboundedness of the action without a quartic term.
  • Another participant clarifies that the potential includes cubic and quartic terms, highlighting that for certain parameter values, the potential has a local minimum at ##\phi=0## and potentially another minimum at a lower energy, which could indicate a "false vacuum" scenario.
  • A later reply acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the equation and emphasizes that the stationary point at ##\phi=0## can be unstable if ##A## is sufficiently large.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical significance of nonzero constant solutions and the stability of the zero solution. There is no consensus on the implications of the parameters ##A## and ##B##, nor on the conditions for stability and normalizability.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the parameters and the nature of the potential, as well as the implications of stability and normalizability, which remain unresolved.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
611
Suppose I have a self interacting real scalar field ##\phi## with equation of motion

##\partial^i \partial_i \phi + m^2 \phi = -A \phi^2 - B\phi^3##,

and I attempt to find constant solutions ##\phi (x,t) = C## for it. The trivial solution is the zero solution ##\phi (x,t) = 0##, but there can also be two more constant solutions depending on the values of ##A##, ##B## and ##m##. Obviously ##B## needs to be positive for the system's energy to be bounded from below, but ##A## seems to be arbitrary. Higher order interaction terms would probably make this non-renormalizable.

Do the two nonzero constant solutions have any physical significance? Does this equation allow situations where the static solutions are unstable, becoming something else very quickly if perturbed even a little?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it matter that the operators ##\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=C## don't go to zero as ##\mathbf{x} \rightarrow \infty##? I know that's a requirement for wavefunctions in QM, but I'm not sure what the constraints on the operators in QFT are.
 
I'm interpreting the field as a classical field here, similar to an air pressure field or an electromagnetic vector potential. I don't think this kind of fields have to be normalizable.
 
1. The quadratic term on the right just changes the mass, and of course $m^2+A$ must be nonnegative for a physical theory.

2. Without an additional $\phi^4$ term, the action is classically unbounded, hence one wouldn't expect a meaningful quantum solution.

3. With the additional $\phi^4$ term, the zero solution may be unstable. Then the physical vacuum state is (in the classical limit) in a global minimizer of the action, corresponding to a nonzero constant solution. This is just a slightly generaized version of the familiar process of mass generation through broken symmetry.
 
A. Neumaier, you are misreading the equation. The terms on the right come from cubic and quartic terms in the potential.

The complete potential is ##V(\phi)=\frac12 m^2 \phi^2 + \frac13 A \phi^3 + \frac14 B\phi^4##. This potential has a local minimum at ##\phi=0##, but for positive ##B## and large enough ##A##, another minimum at a lower energy, with a maximum in between. For parameters in this range, the minimum at ##\phi=0## is a "false vacuum" in QFT.
 
Avodyne said:
A. Neumaier, you are misreading the equation. The terms on the right come from cubic and quartic terms in the potential.
Oh, sorry, yes, of course. I was thinking of the right hand side in terms of the potential - was too tired yesterday, after a day of travel...

Avodyne said:
This potential has a local minimum at ϕ=0
In general only a stationary point. If ##A## is large enough then this stationary point is an unstable local maximizer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K