Particle resonance and the resonance in a driven, damped classical

Bobhawke
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the analogy between a particle resonance and the resonance in a driven, damped classical oscillator.

I guess I should first ask for a clear definition of a particle resonance - is this just an excited state which decays quickly?

I understand that the KG equation which all quantum fields obey is just the equation for the harmonic oscillator. I don't understand how exactly particle resonances are analagous to resonance in the classical harmonic oscillator - could someone explain please?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bobhawke said:
I guess I should first ask for a clear definition of a particle resonance - is this just an excited state which decays quickly?

Many folks think this, but it's not quite it. You also have a phase shift in the scattering at the resomance mass. If you look at the http://pdg.lbl.gov/2007/reviews/kinemarpp.pdf" , it's covered in 38.5.3. In particular, the Argand plot in Figure 38.6 will indicate that there is a resonance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Bobhawke said:
I am trying to understand the analogy between a particle resonance and the resonance in a driven, damped classical oscillator.

I guess I should first ask for a clear definition of a particle resonance - is this just an excited state which decays quickly?

I understand that the KG equation which all quantum fields obey is just the equation for the harmonic oscillator. I don't understand how exactly particle resonances are analagous to resonance in the classical harmonic oscillator - could someone explain please?

Thanks

This question can be answered from different angles.

When you scatter strong-interacting particles off one another, you experience resonant scattering near certain energies. Resonant means that the interaction probability goes up when the scattering goes through an intermediate state whose invariant mass is near a certain value. We call this a "particle resonance" if it appears that the resonance occurs because of an unstable intermediate strongly-bound state.

Classical damped harmonic oscillator exhibits a resonance (high amplitude) near a certain driving frequency. The amplitude of the oscillator as a function of the frequency follows a bell curve - the peak tells you the resonant frequency and the width tells you how much damping there is.

Particle scattering exhibits a resonance (high probability to interact) near a certain invariant mass. Interaction cross-section as a function of invariant mass follows a bell curve - the peak tells you the mass of the particle resonance and the width tells you how unstable it is. The more unstable the particle, the wider the peak.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top