Particles or Waves: Why Do Electrons Exhibit Interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gaugeboson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Waves
gaugeboson
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If we use a normal gun sending out one bullet at a time, there is obviously no interference. However there is interference in waves. Still, if we send out electrons one at a time, they interfere with each other’s motion. Why is it so? Aren’t electrons particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave function of an electron is a quantity to say something about the probability of finding the electron in space. Bohr's probability interpretation "connect's" the wave nature with the particle nature of quantas.
 
Firing bullets

The reason electrons interfere while bullets do not is because bullets are very very large and hence have very small wavelengths, so the probability distribution of the interference pattern is seen as essentially gaussian. Refer to Feynamn Volume 3, Chapter on double slit experiment (chapters 1,2 or 3 i believe).
 
Bullets do interfere. To see them interfere in a two-slit experiment, you would
have to launch them with a low enough momentum so that the wavlength was comparable
to the slit width.
 
Antiphon said:
Bullets do interfere. To see them interfere in a two-slit experiment, you would
have to launch them with a low enough momentum so that the wavlength was comparable
to the slit width.
And looking at a sufficient distance apart from the slits. :biggrin:

Seratend.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top