Particle's spin when subject to a constant magnetic field

Jalo
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An alkali atom, on it's fundamental state, passes through a Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which will only transmit atoms with their spins aligned along the +z direction. After that the atoms travel, during a finite time τ, through a region of constant magnetic field \vec{B}=B\vec{e_{x}}.

After that time τ the atoms pass through a new Stern-Gerlach apparatum, which only allows atoms with spin along -z to pass. What's the probability that they will pass?

Homework Equations



Pauli matrices
\widehat{H}=-\vec{u_{B}}.\widehat{S}
u_{B}=\frac{q}{2m_{e}}


The Attempt at a Solution



From the problem it's easy to see that the state of the system at the instant t=0 is:

|\psi>(t=0)=|+>_{z}

Then I assumed that, while being under the influence of the constant magnetic field along the x direction, the state is:

|\psi>=\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}

Next I applied the hamiltonian to my state |\psi>. Since \vec{B} = B\vec{e_{x}}:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}|\psi>
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB}{2m}\widehat{S_{x}}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z}+\beta (t) |->_{z})

Since \widehat{S_{x}}=\hbar \sigma _{x}, applying it to |\psi> returns:
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Defining \omega=\frac{qB}{4m}:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=-w\hbar(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Now, using Schrodinger's equation we get:

\widehat{H}|\psi>=i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}|\psi>
\frac{d}{dt}(\alpha (t)|+>_{z} + \beta (t) |->_{z}) = iw(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z})

Separating this we get:

\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)
\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t) = iw\alpha (t)

Applying another derivative to the first differential equation we get:
\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = iw\frac{d}{dt}\beta (t)
\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\alpha (t) = -w^{2}\alpha

Doing the same to the second achieves a similar result:

\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\beta (t) = -w^{2}\beta

Solving both I got:

\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}
\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}

Now, since I know that |\psi>(t=0) = |+>_{z}, I know that:
A+B=1
C = -D

From this I can conclude that:
\beta (t) = Fsin(wt)

This is as far as I can get.. I don't know what to do from here. Am I approaching the problem wrongly? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Daniel.

First, there appears to be a problem with a factor of 2 in your expression
\widehat{H}|\psi>=-\frac{qB\hbar}{4m}(\beta (t)|+>_{z}+\alpha (t) |->_{z}).

I don't believe the 4 in the denominator is correct. Did you include the "g-factor" of the electron? Anyway, you might see if you can track down the error. (Hope I'm not the one in error, I always get a headache with the factors of 2 in this type of problem!)

Later, you have

\alpha (t) = Ae^{iwt} + Be^{-iwt}
\alpha (t) = Ce^{iwt} + De^{-iwt}


In the second equation I think you meant to type \beta (t) instead of \alpha (t).

This looks good (but your ##\omega## will need to be corrected for the factor of 2 problem mentioned above).

But note, C and D are not independent of A and B. Remember you have

\frac{d}{dt}\alpha (t) = iw\beta (t)

So, you can determine \beta (t) from \alpha (t).

You should be able to find A and B from the initial conditions and from the fact that you want your state to be normalized.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I forgot that I was only interested in the |->_{z} component.
Regarding the factor of 2, I'll correct it. However my major issue has been resolved, so thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top