Partition function calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of the partition function in statistical mechanics, specifically how to calculate it using the multiplicity of states. The partition function is expressed as z = SUM[g(E)exp(-BE)], where g(E) represents the number of states at energy E. It clarifies that the relative probability of being in specific states with energies E1 and E2 is given by P(E1)/P(E2) = exp(-βE1)/exp(-βE2). In contrast, the relative probability of being in any state with those energies incorporates multiplicity, resulting in P(E1)/P(E2) = g(E1)exp(-βE1)/g(E2)exp(-βE2). This distinction is crucial for understanding how probabilities are derived from the partition function.
weiss_tal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have some trouble understanding the partition function. In wikipedia it is written that the partition function needs to be calculated with the multiplicity of the states:

z=SUM[g(E)exp(-BE)]

where g(E) is the multiplicity of the states corresponding to energy E.

It is also well known that the relative probability of two different states with different energy is P(E1)/P(E2) = exp(-BE1)/exp(-BE2).

According to the partition function which is the sum of all probabilities, the expression above should be g(E1)exp(-BE1)/g(E2)exp(-BE2)

What is true... ?
Thank you for helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The relative probability of the system being in *specific* states with energy E1 and E2 is P(E1)/P(E2) = exp(-βE1)/exp(-βE2). But the relative probability of the system being in *any* state with energy E1 and E2 is P(E1)/P(E2) = g(E1)exp(-βE1)/g(E2)exp(-βE2).
 
Thanks mister K.
That was very helpful!

Tal.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top