Alright, I have a kind of dumb question:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Why do I distinguish between dq and dq_{i}when considering the propagation from q_{i}to q to q_{f}?

For example, if we want the wave function at some q_{f}and t_{f}given q_{i}and t_{i}, we may write:

ψ(q_{f},t_{f})=∫K(q_{f}t_{f};q_{i}t_{i})ψ(q_{i},t_{i})dq_{i}

Why do we distinguish between dq_{i}and say, dq, of an intermediate point q?

I understand that a second integration arises, naturally, since another propagator is defined. I just don't get the need to distinguish? I feel like it's almost book-keeping, like we write out (or don't since we use product notation followed by a script D) our dq's so we don't have to write out more integrals...

I know that's not right though, because we treat q and q_{i}as different things...

Some direction would be great...I feel kind of dumb for whatever I'm missing.

edit:

I think I mis-titled this a little, but it's close enough, I hope.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Path Integral Basics (Why dimension increases in the integrals?)

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**