Path Integral Basics (Why dimension increases in the integrals?)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between the differential elements dq and dqi in path integrals, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics. The integral expression for the wave function, ψ(qf, tf) = ∫K(qf, tf; qi, ti)ψ(qi, ti)dqi, highlights the necessity of differentiating between initial and intermediate states during propagation. This distinction is crucial for accurately representing the infinite sum of infinitesimal paths that contribute to the overall quantum state transition. Participants emphasize that this differentiation is not merely bookkeeping but essential for the mathematical integrity of path integral formulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with path integral formulation in quantum physics
  • Knowledge of integrals and differential calculus
  • Basic concepts of phase space in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of path integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of propagators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of infinitesimal paths in quantum state transitions
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of phase space and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists interested in path integral formulations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of wave function propagation and quantum state transitions.

Elwin.Martin
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
Alright, I have a kind of dumb question:

Why do I distinguish between dq and dqi when considering the propagation from qi to q to qf?

For example, if we want the wave function at some qf and tf given qi and ti, we may write:
ψ(qf,tf)=∫K(qftf;qiti)ψ(qi,ti)dqi

Why do we distinguish between dqi and say, dq, of an intermediate point q?

I understand that a second integration arises, naturally, since another propagator is defined. I just don't get the need to distinguish? I feel like it's almost book-keeping, like we write out (or don't since we use product notation followed by a script D) our dq's so we don't have to write out more integrals...

I know that's not right though, because we treat q and qi as different things...

Some direction would be great...I feel kind of dumb for whatever I'm missing.

edit:
I think I mis-titled this a little, but it's close enough, I hope.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elwin.Martin said:
Alright, I have a kind of dumb question:

Why do I distinguish between dq and dqi when considering the propagation from qi to q to qf?

For example, if we want the wave function at some qf and tf given qi and ti, we may write:
ψ(qf,tf)=∫K(qftf;qiti)ψ(qi,ti)dqi

Why do we distinguish between dqi and say, dq, of an intermediate point q?

I understand that a second integration arises, naturally, since another propagator is defined. I just don't get the need to distinguish? I feel like it's almost book-keeping, like we write out (or don't since we use product notation followed by a script D) our dq's so we don't have to write out more integrals...

I know that's not right though, because we treat q and qi as different things...

Some direction would be great...I feel kind of dumb for whatever I'm missing.

edit:
I think I mis-titled this a little, but it's close enough, I hope.

I'm not quite sure what you're asking but when deriving path integrals one takes the propagation (or the sum of all propagations) between states i and f and subdivides them, and then subdivides them again, and again until the path between two states has been turned from a finite path in phase space to an infinite sum of infinitesimal paths.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K