Path Integral QM: Intro and Forward/Backward Scattering

grzz
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
26
hello

I started to read ‘QFT in a Nutshell’ by A. Zee. In the introduction to the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics there is the story about a particle going through a series of screens with holes drilled through them. Then the number of holes in each screen is increased. This results in the spaces on the screen which are not yet drilled becoming very small.
My difficulty is this. The undrilled spaces are then so small that they themselves may act as obstacles thereby providing an amplitude of scattering the particles backwards. Am I complicating things by including this backward scattering together with the amplitude of forward propagation of the paticle?
Any help?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grzz said:
The undrilled spaces are then so small that they themselves may act as obstacles thereby providing an amplitude of scattering the particles backwards.

This is true even when the undrilled spaces are not small. For example, if we have a screen with a single hole, the entire rest of the screen has a nonzero amplitude of scattering the particle backwards.

grzz said:
Am I complicating things by including this backward scattering together with the amplitude of forward propagation of the paticle?

Yes, at least for the simple version Zee is considering at this point in the book. The key is that, in the example given, we are evaluating the amplitude for the particle to go from a particular source, which has some location in space, to a particular detector, which has some other location in space. We are not considering the amplitude for the particle to go somewhere else, such as being scattered backwards and flying off to a place where we don't even have a detector.

(And even more strictly, it should be "location in spacetime", not just "location in space"--i.e., we are evaluating the amplitude for the particle to be emitted from the source at some particular time and detected at the detector at some other particular time.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top