Path of Light Beam in Plane Parallel Plate

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


In plane parallel plate the refractive index is a function of coordinate ##z##, so that ##n=n_0 -{n}'z^2## for ##{n}'>0##. The origin of the coordinate system is in the middle of the layer, and ##z## is parallel to the normal of the layer. In paraxial approximation calculate the path of a light beam.

Homework Equations


If we use parametrization ##s##:

##\frac{d}{ds}(n(z)\frac{d\vec r}{ds})=\nabla n##

The Attempt at a Solution


For ##z## coordinate: $$\frac{d}{ds}(n(z)\frac{d z}{ds})=\frac{dn}{dz}=-2{n}'z$$ $$\frac{d}{ds}([n_0-{n}'z^2]\frac{d z}{ds})=-2{n}'z$$ Now I hope I can use approximation that ##dz\sim dx## this would bring me to $$[n_0-{n}'z^2]\frac{d^2z}{dx^2}=-2{n}'z$$ and finally since ##z## is very small, than I can forget about ##z^2## term. $${z}''+\frac{2{n}'}{n_0}z=0$$ which brings me to my final solution $$z(x)=Asin(\sqrt{\frac{2{n}'}{n_0}}x)+Bcos(\sqrt{\frac{2{n}'}{n_0}}x)$$
Or is this completely wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skrat said:
Now I hope I can use approximation that ##dz\sim dx##
Reconsider this. Paraxial means that the ray always makes a small angle to the z-axis.

Homework Equations


If we use parametrization ##s##:

##\frac{d}{ds}(n(z)\frac{d\vec r}{ds})=\nabla n##

Note that this is a vector equation. So, you will need to think about its components.
 
Hmmm, ok firstly, let me apologize for a mistake in my first post. There should be ##ds\approx dx## and not ##dz\approx ds##.
But you got me a bit confused now. I think you are trying to say that I should use approximation where ##ds\approx dz## but... this is in contrary with the problem. The problem says that the ray is only traveling close to the centre of the layer (where ##z## is very small). Or...?

The other two components only give me $$n(z)\frac{dx}{ds}=n(z)\sin\vartheta _x=C_x$$ and $$n(z)=\sin\vartheta _y=C_y.$$ Do they have any physical interpretation?
 
OK, I guess I misinterpreted the question. Since they only mention a z-axis, I assumed that paraxial meant that the ray is traveling approximately in the z-direction as it passes through the plate. So, yes, I was thinking ds ≅ dz.

[EDIT: I agree with your solution.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes skrat
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top