PDE: Proving that a set is an orthogonal bases for L2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set {sin(nx)} for n=1 to ∞ is an orthogonal basis for L²(0, π). The original poster attempts to demonstrate orthogonality using the scalar product in L² and questions whether this is sufficient to establish that the set is indeed a basis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to prove both orthogonality and completeness to establish that the set forms a basis. There are attempts to clarify the definitions and requirements for linear independence and spanning the space.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach proving linear independence from orthogonality, while others are exploring the implications of completeness and how to demonstrate it. There is an ongoing exploration of inner products and their role in deriving contradictions related to linear independence.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding definitions and completeness in the context of PDEs, indicating that the problem may involve nuanced understanding of functional analysis concepts.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Show that the set {sin(nx)} from n=1 to n=∞ is orthogonal bases for L^2(0, π).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Proof: Let f(x)= sin(nx), consider scalar product in L^2(0, π)

<br /> (ƒ_n , ƒ_m) = \int_{0}^π ƒ_n (x) ƒ_m (x) \, dx = \int_{0}^π sin(nx)sin(mx) \, dx = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^π cos(n-m)x - cos(n+m)x \, dx = \frac{1}{2} ( \int_{0}^π cos(n-m)x - \int_{0}^π cos(n+m)x \, dx = \frac{1}{2} ( {\frac{\sin(n-m)x}{(n-m)x}} - {\frac{\sin(n+m)x}{(n+m)x}} ) = 0<br />

Of course the last result is from 0 to pi for both parts, but didn't know how to latex it :p.

My question is, is this everything to show that the set is orthogonal bases for L2 (0, π)?

I think it is, but definitions in the crazy world of PDE are confusing to me. I do not believe I need to show completeness per the question.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:
My question is, is this everything to show that the set is orthogonal bases for L2 (0, π)?
That's part of the answer, as it proves the elements of the set are pairwise orthogonal.
But now you need to prove it's a basis, which involves proving:
  1. That the set spans ##\mathscr{L}^2(0,\pi)##, ie that any element of ##\mathscr{L}^2(0,\pi)## can be written as the limit of a sequence of linear combinations of elements of the set.
  2. That the set is linearly independent, ie that there is no nontrivial finite linear combination of elements that is equal to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
@andrewkirk I see what you are saying.

I only proved that the system was orthogonal, but did not show that it was a bases.

I'm having a little trouble going further.

I guess I can set d = sin(nx)/||sin(nx)||, where {d} from 1 to infinity is a complete orthogonal set in L^2.

I can expand this in terms of {sin(nx)} for any f in L^2[0,pi]

f = sum from 1 to infinity <f,sin(nx)>sin(nx)/||sin(nx)||^2

So I can show that it is complete orthogonal set in L^2
 
If you've shown it's complete then all that's left to prove is linear independence, and that follows easily from the orthogonality. If we have a finite set of nonzero functions in the set, for which there is a linear combination that is zero, how can we derive a contradiction from that using the fact that they're all orthogonal?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Could we take two elements and take the inner product and by orthogonality we show that element*element = 0. thus we see linear independence?
 
That's the broad idea. But it's not necessarily just two elements.

All that's needed for the set to not be linearly independent is for there to exist some integer ##N>0## and set of complex numbers ##c_1,...,c_N##, such that ##c_N\neq 0## and
$$\sum_{k=1}^N c_k\sin kx=0$$

Following your suggestion of taking an inner product, what could you take an inner product of with both sides of this equation, to obtain (via a few more steps) a contradiction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Ugh, I understand exactly what you are trying to do, but my mind is blown.

The right side will be 0 as anything product 0 = 0.
The left side, perhaps the set of complex numbers (c1, c2,...,ck)
 
We want to take the inner product of the left hand side with a vector/function that will give us a nonzero left side. That will give us a contradiction because the right side is zero.

The inner product of the left side with a function f is the sum of the inner products of each term on the LHS with f.
What should we choose f to be so that we know that at least one of those N inner products is nonzero?
Bear in mind that there is only one of the ##c_k## that we know to be nonzero. Which one?
 
RJLiberator said:
@andrewkirk I see what you are saying.

I only proved that the system was orthogonal, but did not show that it was a bases.

I'm having a little trouble going further.

I guess I can set d = sin(nx)/||sin(nx)||, where {d} from 1 to infinity is a complete orthogonal set in L^2.

I can expand this in terms of {sin(nx)} for any f in L^2[0,pi]

f = sum from 1 to infinity <f,sin(nx)>sin(nx)/||sin(nx)||^2

So I can show that it is complete orthogonal set in L^2
Maybe I'm missing something, but how did you show the set is complete?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
  • #10
We know that C_N is non zero.
So we can multiply both sides by C_N*sinkx ?

As the inner product of C_N and C_N is 1.
 
  • #11
@Samy_A

From my notes, I can take say g(x) = sin(nx)/||sin(nx)|| then {g(x)} from N = 1 to infinity is an orthonormal set in L^2.

f = sum from n =1 to n=infinity of <f, sin(nx)>sin(nx) / ||sin(nx)||^2
||f||^2 = sum from n = 1 to n = infinity of |<f,sin(nx)>|^2/||sin(nx)||^2

{sin(nx)} from n = 1 to n = infinity is thus a complete orthogonal set in L^2 (0,pi).
 
  • #12
RJLiberator said:
@Samy_A

From my notes, I can take say g(x) = sin(nx)/||sin(nx)|| then {g(x)} from N = 1 to infinity is an orthonormal set in L^2.

f = sum from n =1 to n=infinity of <f, sin(nx)>sin(nx) / ||sin(nx)||^2
||f||^2 = sum from n = 1 to n = infinity of |<f,sin(nx)>|^2/||sin(nx)||^2

{sin(nx)} from n = 1 to n = infinity is thus a complete orthogonal set in L^2 (0,pi).
Ok, if it is given (or proven) in your course that the set is complete, then that's it. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
  • #13
RJLiberator said:
We know that C_N is non zero.
So we can multiply both sides by C_N*sinkx ?
If by 'multiply' you mean 'take the inner product of' then yes. Can you do that and get to the solution?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
  • #14
Yes, my apologies @andrewkirk , I mean take the inner product of it.

I'm at work now, so I'm trying to work this out in my head, but...
If we take the inner product of both sides, we would see that all the terms cancel out to be left with
Cn*Cnsin^2(kx)

where Cn*Cn is Cn multiplied by the conjugation of cn (inner product)

(I will try this out in more detail upon returning home in a number of hours)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K