PE and KE, mass sliding down incline into a spring (no friction)

AI Thread Summary
A block of mass 15 kg slides down a frictionless incline at an angle of 26°, compressing a spring by 4 cm upon stopping. The discussion focuses on calculating the distance the block travels down the incline and its speed just before contacting the spring. Participants highlight the importance of considering gravitational potential energy and the correct application of energy conservation principles, as kinematic equations may not apply due to varying acceleration. Miscalculations arise when participants confuse the total distance with the distance before the spring. Ultimately, the energy method is confirmed as the correct approach for solving the problem.
J-dizzal
Messages
394
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


In the figure, a block of mass m = 15 kg is released from rest on a frictionless incline of angle θ = 26°. Below the block is a spring that can be compressed 3.1 cm by a force of 380 N. The block momentarily stops when it compresses the spring by 4.0 cm. (a) How far does the block move down the incline from its rest position to this stopping point? (b) What is the speed of the block just as it touches the spring?

http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs7165/art/qb/qu/c08/fig08_41.gif

Homework Equations


20150706_180858_zpsnlsvs73a.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution


20150706_181021_zps1nvxryei.jpg

20150706_181132_zps4gpctm2a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at your expression for Ws at the bottom... you used (0.4m)^2 instead of (0.04m)^2
 
Hey Nathanael, thanks. let me try this again
 
Nathanael said:
Look at your expression for Ws at the bottom... you used (0.4m)^2 instead of (0.04m)^2
when solving for part b I am using K=1/2 mv2 , where K=9.8065, m=15 and i get v=1.143
 
using kinematic eq. v2=2a(x-x0) where a=4.296 and x=0.15218. I got v=0.4461 m/s but not correct
 
J-dizzal said:
using kinematic eq. v2=2a(x-x0) where a=4.296 and x=0.15218. I got v=0.4461 m/s but not correct
Kinematics equations were derived with the assumption that acceleration is constant, so it doesn't apply to this situation. (Their use is pretty limited.)

J-dizzal said:
when solving for part b I am using K=1/2 mv2 , where K=9.8065, m=15 and i get v=1.143
I think this is the trap they expected you to fall into. Be careful with the energy: is there any other form of energy involved?
 
Nathanael said:
Kinematics equations were derived with the assumption that acceleration is constant, so it doesn't apply to this situation. (Their use is pretty limited.)I think this is the trap they expected you to fall into. Be careful with the energy: is there any other form of energy involved?
I don't see why kinematic eq won't work, because its asking for velocity before it even touches the spring. so a should be constant?
There could be a potential energy of gravity on the block. U=mgh
 
J-dizzal said:
I don't see why kinematic eq won't work, because its asking for velocity before it even touches the spring. so a should be constant?
You're right, I wasn't thinking about what you were doing o0) sorry
Your mistake is that x you used is the total distance including the distance compressed. You just want the distance before it touches.

J-dizzal said:
There could be a potential energy of gravity on the block. U=mgh
Right. As the spring is compressed gravity is still doing work, so the kinetic energy of the block right before it touches is not equal to the total energy of the system.
 
Nathanael said:
You're right, I wasn't thinking about what you were doing o0) sorry
Your mistake is that x you used is the total distance including the distance compressed. You just want the distance before it touches.Right. As the spring is compressed gravity is still doing work, so the kinetic energy of the block right before it touches is not equal to the total energy of the system.
wouldnt the total distance be .15218+.04?

Edit. nevermind its .15218-.04 for the dist before spring

Edit2. after plugging in .11218 i still am doing something wrong when solving for v

Edit3. ok i got it. i was trying to square .11218 in the kinematic equation, i don't know why i did that.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Since you got it I will tell you the energy method of doing it: ##E_{kinetic}=E_{total}-0.04mg\sin(26°)## and you already determined Etotal for an earlier part.

What you used in post #4 was Ekinetic=Etotal
 
  • Like
Likes J-dizzal
Back
Top